414
submitted 4 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 16 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

I still often say trans/tranny when referring to a transmission. It's hard to train those language patterns out of yourself. Not to mention things like master and slave cylinders, hermophradite/mophradite calipers and fittings, gender changers.

Reamers and reaming, bastard files and bastard threads, deep hole drilling, male/female fittings, shafts and lube, prongs, orifice.

Open source has tried to redefine master/slave in things like SPI to controller and peripheral, ie. MOSI/COPI but the rest of the documentation and all of the documentation that came before it still uses it.

Technical language is full of this stuff and is often the clearest way to express something. It is the standard and changing industrial standards is very hard.

It's funny, is changing this stuff performative or does it really matter?

I would say it matters. However, it is likely that new terms being created today will become offensive in the future.

I could see Big Endian and Little Endian becoming offensive if it isn't already considered offensive.

[-] [email protected] 11 points 4 days ago

Allowlist/Blocklist vs whitelist/blacklist in software.

A lot of product changed the terms on the front end but the backend still uses it, and our internal tools mostly use it.

[-] [email protected] 10 points 4 days ago

Big Endian/Little Endian is a reference to Gulliver's Travels, where there was a society that argued whether to break hard boiled eggs on the little end or the big end. It is pretty much non offensive and would take a stretch to become offensive in the future.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 4 days ago

It's also a children's song that I was taught as a child in kindergarten or maybe church. That's what i associate it with.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago
[-] [email protected] 8 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

You tell someone to go lube the shaft in complete seriousness, and they're going to giggle and pull a, "That's what she said..."

Not a probelm, per se, but it is a good example of just how much of technical language can be perceived as a double entendre. I generally don't realize I've said anything like that until a new kid starts snickering.

This is also part, not all, of the reason there is resistance to changing these things. A good chunk of that resistance is because those using these words have no bad intent whatsoever. It's not even on the radar.

And of course, there are plenty of bigoted shitheads who don't want to change.

[-] [email protected] 7 points 4 days ago

I'm honest and not trying to be an ass, but what is the issue with double entendre? And how is it a hallmark of bigots to do so? Isn't "that what she said" a ribbing on that weird boss from the Office?

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago

Nothing is wrong with double entendres depending on intent. My humor and language is about as crass as it comes depending on my audience.

I'm saying that there are so many terms like this, gender and similar is built into english technical language.

Personal experience, hired a black woman when I was running a shop. Half the crew has the maturity and grace of drunk squirrels. I easily pass as het. I say something about a female thread being buggered. Now I've got two knuckleheads in the back giggling even though she gets that I was not being offensive. Still, that sucks for both of us and I want to slap the shit out of the knuckleheads and I feel like shit for causing it.

And we wonder why all minorities are so underrepresented in STEM. It's a minefield.

In my perfect little world, we don't change the terms and instead reduce the dumbass level. In reality, we navigate the minefield as best we can and change the things that cause the most offense.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

I feel like "that's what she said" is older than the office, though that definitely (re)popularized it.

The office (US) came out in 2005, and I'm pretty sure I'd been hearing it before then. I could be wrong though, as that was twenty years ago.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 3 days ago

Yeah I think part of the joke was Michael had latched on to an existing joke and kept using it in a setting where it wasn't appropriate, especially since he was the manager.

Prior to the office, it was used in Wayne's world gags on SNL (late 80s), and Johnny Carson used it before that (70s and 80s).

Apparently it originated from a British version, "said the actress to the bishop" that was used back in the early 1900s in music hall comedy and army banter.

Though the real joke is pointing out sexual innuendo and double meanings (both intentional and unintentional), which goes back at least as far as Shakespeare but is probably older than recorded history.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 4 days ago

Oh yeah, my friends group and I were hitting "that's what (s)he said" pretty hard in the nineties.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 4 days ago* (last edited 4 days ago)

Nothing, nor is there any issue with big / little endian, no relation to "Indian", which is a different word with a different pronunciation.

Some of those things do matter, like "black / white" meaning "bad / good" as it affects the way we think about those colours, and "master / slave" is dependent on context.

this post was submitted on 19 Jun 2025
414 points (97.0% liked)

196

3684 readers
1610 users here now

Community Rules

You must post before you leave

Be nice. Assume others have good intent (within reason).

Block or ignore posts, comments, and users that irritate you in some way rather than engaging. Report if they are actually breaking community rules.

Use content warnings and/or mark as NSFW when appropriate. Most posts with content warnings likely need to be marked NSFW.

Most 196 posts are memes, shitposts, cute images, or even just recent things that happened, etc. There is no real theme, but try to avoid posts that are very inflammatory, offensive, very low quality, or very "off topic".

Bigotry is not allowed, this includes (but is not limited to): Homophobia, Transphobia, Racism, Sexism, Abelism, Classism, or discrimination based on things like Ethnicity, Nationality, Language, or Religion.

Avoid shilling for corporations, posting advertisements, or promoting exploitation of workers.

Proselytization, support, or defense of authoritarianism is not welcome. This includes but is not limited to: imperialism, nationalism, genocide denial, ethnic or racial supremacy, fascism, Nazism, Marxism-Leninism, Maoism, etc.

Avoid AI generated content.

Avoid misinformation.

Avoid incomprehensible posts.

No threats or personal attacks.

No spam.

Moderator Guidelines

Moderator Guidelines

  • Don’t be mean to users. Be gentle or neutral.
  • Most moderator actions which have a modlog message should include your username.
  • When in doubt about whether or not a user is problematic, send them a DM.
  • Don’t waste time debating/arguing with problematic users.
  • Assume the best, but don’t tolerate sealioning/just asking questions/concern trolling.
  • Ask another mod to take over cases you struggle with, if you get tired, or when things get personal.
  • Ask the other mods for advice when things get complicated.
  • Share everything you do in the mod matrix, both so several mods aren't unknowingly handling the same issues, but also so you can receive feedback on what you intend to do.
  • Don't rush mod actions. If a case doesn't need to be handled right away, consider taking a short break before getting to it. This is to say, cool down and make room for feedback.
  • Don’t perform too much moderation in the comments, except if you want a verdict to be public or to ask people to dial a convo down/stop. Single comment warnings are okay.
  • Send users concise DMs about verdicts about them, such as bans etc, except in cases where it is clear we don’t want them at all, such as obvious transphobes. No need to notify someone they haven’t been banned of course.
  • Explain to a user why their behavior is problematic and how it is distressing others rather than engage with whatever they are saying. Ask them to avoid this in the future and send them packing if they do not comply.
  • First warn users, then temp ban them, then finally perma ban them when they break the rules or act inappropriately. Skip steps if necessary.
  • Use neutral statements like “this statement can be considered transphobic” rather than “you are being transphobic”.
  • No large decisions or actions without community input (polls or meta posts f.ex.).
  • Large internal decisions (such as ousting a mod) might require a vote, needing more than 50% of the votes to pass. Also consider asking the community for feedback.
  • Remember you are a voluntary moderator. You don’t get paid. Take a break when you need one. Perhaps ask another moderator to step in if necessary.

founded 5 months ago
MODERATORS