207
Banned over fish joke
(lemmy.sdf.org)
This is a community in the spirit of "Am I The Asshole" where people can post their own bans from lemmy or reddit or whatever and get some feedback from others whether the ban was justified or not.
Sometimes one just wants to be able to challenge the arguments some mod made and this could be the place for that.
All posts should follow this basic structure:
Expect to receive feedback about your posts, they might even be negative.
Make sure you follow this instance's code of conduct. In other words we won't allow bellyaching about being sanctioned for hate speech or bigotry.
YTPB matrix channel: For real-time discussions about bastards or to appeal mod actions in YPTB itself.
Some acronyms you might see.
Relevant comms
No, that is just regular upvoting and downvoting.
A prestige based system takes into account previous voting based on community outcomes, and aggregates over time a running value that represents how effective that particular user has been to matching the zeitgeist of the community. So the more someones posting and voting pattern appeals to the community that they occur in, the more 'valuable' that person's vote is
So a person that has been consistently uploading content that other viewers consider quality gets more community prominence and their votes are weighted more than a person who just showed up yesterday or someone who consistently posts divisive and unwanted content as decided by the community
Does this mean that some communities will get taken over by bad actors? Yes, but then you just leave the community, or start an initiative to change the zeitgeist of the community. The thing is, NOW those bad actors don't get a free pass just because one of their friends worms their way into modding BECAUSE there are NO mods.
Lastly voting just up and down is so 2010, as much as I fucking hate Buzzfeed their tagging system is the start of something good, but they don't do much useful with that info but aim for virality.
So a multi dimensional voting space based off of tag clouds where the user can refine the kind of content they view based off of others reactions such as 'funny, informative, shocking, wholesome' and even negative tags like 'outrageous, unhelpful, argumentative' just to name a few.
TL;DR: The longer and more often any given user's contributions are considered positive by a community, the more power that user has to shape the future of the community.