you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 3 points 1 year ago (2 children)

The first game was like RPG soul food. It didn't do anything new, the gameplay was fine and the story wasn't bad. Nothing innovative but nothing poorly executed. I think people should look to the game as explanation for why Nintendo doesn't make the 'normal Mario game' they want. Innovation is the simplest way to dress up a game, even if you like the loop it's healthier if the sequel is different.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I honestly don't know why so many game journalists and bloggers are obsessed with innovations, and judge games based on that. A game doesn't need to reinvent a genre to be good and enjoyable.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment