Science

4 readers

6 users here now

This magazine is dedicated to discussions on scientific discoveries, research, and theories across various fields, including physics, chemistry, biology, astronomy, and more. Whether you are a scientist, a science enthusiast, or simply curious about the world around us, this is the place for you. Here you can share your knowledge, ask questions, and engage in discussions on a wide range of scientific topics. From the latest breakthroughs to historical discoveries and ongoing research, this category covers a wide range of topics related to science.

founded 2 years ago

New studies bolster theory coronavirus emerged from the wild (apnews.com)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Two new studies provide more evidence that the coronavirus pandemic originated in a Wuhan, China market where live animals were sold – further bolstering the theory that the virus emerged in the wild rather than escaping from a Chinese lab.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 25 points 1 year ago (2 children)

Conclusively?

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

So "conclusively" that one of the scientists in question denies that he was even sick at all in the alleged timeframe, let alone sick with Covid:

https://www.science.org/content/article/ridiculous-says-chinese-scientist-accused-being-pandemic-s-patient-zero

I fucking hate that Matt Taibbi fell so far.

Also, one of these new studies shows the early outbreak clustered around the Wuhan wet market, not the Virology Institute, which directly contradicts Taibbi & co's assertion that "patient zero" was part of the lab.