32
submitted 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Gwynne wisely sits this one out:

Context

Sources: X1, X2, X3, X4, X5

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 37 points 4 weeks ago

This is why NASA should never have outsourced its rocket programme.

[-] [email protected] 14 points 4 weeks ago

What!?? Being reliant on a petulant manchild isn't a good long term strategy??? Who would have guessed?

[-] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago* (last edited 4 weeks ago)

What would the alternative for transport to and from the ISS have been? Keep flying the Space Shuttle for two more decades? Ares I + Orion? SLS + Orion? Rely on Soyuz indefinitely?

Falcon 9 + Dragon are one of the best returns on investment NASA have gotten recently.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 4 weeks ago

Considering the head of the Russian space programme threatened to yeet the ISS at Ukraine, relying on Soyuz might not be any more sane than this.

[-] [email protected] 5 points 4 weeks ago

Well, it’s not looking too good right now.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 weeks ago

or maybe the government should have purchased the capsule outright instead of on a contract.

this post was submitted on 06 Jun 2025
32 points (97.1% liked)

SpaceflightMemes

1243 readers
1 users here now

A Lemmy analogue to r/SpaceXMasterRace.

Related communities for serious posts and discussion:

FAQ:

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS