116

submitted 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

16 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 22 points 2 days ago

those who publicly identify an officer "with the intent to obstruct a criminal investigation or immigration enforcement operation."

Intent is notoriously hard to prove. OTHO, how have we fallen so far as to be having this discussion?!

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 days ago

I don't want to interfere. I just want everyone to be able to put folks into categories of "decent people" and "monsters."

[-] [email protected] 15 points 2 days ago

Speak for yourself. I'm here to interfere with the gestapo.

[-] [email protected] 12 points 2 days ago

Intent is notoriously hard to prove.

Don't worry, they'll charge you anyway, and you'll be bled dry with legal costs.

[-] [email protected] 8 points 2 days ago

Intent is notoriously hard to prove.

So what? They'll just ship you to CECOT without a trial.

this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025

116 points (100.0% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2935 readers

598 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS