335
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 05 Jun 2025
335 points (99.1% liked)
Uplifting News
15506 readers
223 users here now
Welcome to /c/UpliftingNews, a dedicated space where optimism and positivity converge to bring you the most heartening and inspiring stories from around the world. We strive to curate and share content that lights up your day, invigorates your spirit, and inspires you to spread positivity in your own way. This is a sanctuary for those seeking a break from the incessant negativity and rage (e.g. schadenfreude) often found in today's news cycle. From acts of everyday kindness to large-scale philanthropic efforts, from individual achievements to community triumphs, we bring you news that gives hope, fosters empathy, and strengthens the belief in humanity's capacity for good.
Here in /c/UpliftingNews, we uphold the values of respect, empathy, and inclusivity, fostering a supportive and vibrant community. We encourage you to share your positive news, comment, engage in uplifting conversations, and find solace in the goodness that exists around us. We are more than a news-sharing platform; we are a community built on the power of positivity and the collective desire for a more hopeful world. Remember, your small acts of kindness can be someone else's big ray of hope. Be part of the positivity revolution; share, uplift, inspire!
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
No you're not the only one, lots of uninformed people are scared.
If you are aware of a specific mechanism that this kind of treatment can go poorly, then you are free to share the studies or the research that supports it.
But just being scared of new things isn't beneficial. There are whole communities that are keeping diseases alive because they don't trust science.
You know what cracks me up? That there's a rather high likelihood that I know more about mRNA that you do. Ignorance is bliss I suppose.
Alright, so here's one a concern.
As you're certainly aware, there are studies that have found that viral RNA can carry into the host's nucleus and be reverse-transcribed into the infected cell's genome (for your convenience, here's one such finding for SARS-CoV-2 https://doi.org/10.1073/pnas.2105968118), and that it produces chimeric transcripts that fuse the viral and host sequences.
Can you address how an mRNA vaccine would be able to ensure that such reverse transcription would not occur?
Here's another concern.
The Pfizer BNT162b2 COVID vaccine is, of course, a lipid nanoparticle (LNP) mRNA vaccine, which is basically the approach discussed in the OP article. This article (Curr. Issues Mol. Biol. 2022, 44(3), 1115-1126) found that BNT162b2 mRNA is reverse transcribed intracellularly into DNA in as fast as 6 h upon BNT162b2 exposure. Not only that, it has also found increased nuclear expression and distribution of LINE-1, an endogenous reverse transcriptase.
Since we previously covered the integration of foreign RNA into the host's DNA, can you please explain how do you propose to identify and control for possible epigenetic effects of mRNA vaccines?
Seems like people found my zombie apocalypse parallel a bit too farfetched, but cancerous growth and tumors are in essence breakdowns of the genetic machinary in our cells, which mRNA vaccines are just too happy to mess with. All I'm advocating is more research, better understanding, and safety.