157
Flatpak is not perfect, but it's getting better
(thelibre.news)
A community for everything relating to the GNU/Linux operating system
Also check out:
Original icon base courtesy of [email protected] and The GIMP
Flatpak is quite fucking far from perfect, and will always remain so due to its flawed design and UX approach.
Pretty sure the culprit here is Fedora’s packaging which adds an opaque systemd timer to run auto-updates, but the thread immediately next to this one on my homepage just happened to be a nice case-study in Flatpak fuckery: https://lemmy.world/post/30654407
Of course, the proposed changes in the article do nothing to fix this sorta problem, which happens to be the variety that end users actually care about. Flatpak is an epic noob trap since it pretends to be a plug-n-play beginner friendly tool, but causes all sorts of subtle headaches that newcomers inevitably don’t have diagnostic experience to address.
Flatpak doesn't have a UI? It is a packaging format.
From https://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/introduction.html#terminology
You might be thinking of AppImages, which are more of a pure file format.
Are you talking about theming?
I’m talking about the executable binary
flatpak
, which is the interface used to execute and manage applications distributed in the Flatpak bundle format.https://docs.flatpak.org/en/latest/flatpak-command-reference.html#flatpak