272
Elon Musk ‘took so much ketamine campaigning it damaged his bladder’
(www.thetimes.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
272 points (98.6% liked)
Enough Musk Spam
3051 readers
113 users here now
For those that have had enough of the Elon Musk worship online.
No flaming, baiting, etc. This community is intended for those opposed to the influx of Elon Musk-related advertising online. Coming here to defend Musk or his companies will not get you banned, but it likely will result in downvotes. Please use the reporting feature if you see a rule violation.
Opinions from all sides of the political spectrum are welcome here. However, we kindly ask that off-topic political discussion be kept to a minimum, so as to focus on the goal of this sub. This community is minimally moderated, so discussion and the power of upvotes/downvotes are allowed, provided lemmy.world rules are not broken.
Post links to instances of obvious Elon Musk fanboy brigading in default subreddits, lemmy/kbin communities/instances, astroturfing from Tesla/SpaceX/etc., or any articles critical of Musk, his ideas, unrealistic promises and timelines, or the working conditions at his companies.
Tesla-specific discussion can be posted here as well as our sister community /c/RealTesla.
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I don't think you'd say the same about me taking a sledgehammer to your head. That's what Elon did to a lot of agencies.
Oh, and he's not enabling a fascist government. He is the fascist government.
A person and an agency are not comparable.
Brother, if you take away the money and the people from an agency, what's left? Nothing.
Except killing an agency you might not kill a single person, while killing a person you kill a person.
Or you might kill hundreds or thousands, because the agency was crucial for ensuring safety standards. But Elon would never kill such an agency right?
Anyways, you're not getting the point. If I remove the most vital parts of an agency, it's not an agency anymore. You can't just go "uhhh, maybe it's a bad agency if it doesn't survive massive cuts", just like you would not blame a human for not surviving severe damage.
OK. It's not what I meant, rather that all state institutions should be "nomad formations", so to say - possible to kill and build again in a couple of weeks without touching the rest. But that's probably off topic and I'm just too nervous a few last days.
,yeah that's wishful thinking. No such agency would ever be useful.
A bureaucratic structure knowing it can't be replaced is actively harmful.