159
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 31 May 2025
159 points (98.2% liked)
technology
23791 readers
460 users here now
On the road to fully automated luxury gay space communism.
Spreading Linux propaganda since 2020
- Ways to run Microsoft/Adobe and more on Linux
- The Ultimate FOSS Guide For Android
- Great libre software on Windows
- Hey you, the lib still using Chrome. Read this post!
Rules:
- 1. Obviously abide by the sitewide code of conduct. Bigotry will be met with an immediate ban
- 2. This community is about technology. Offtopic is permitted as long as it is kept in the comment sections
- 3. Although this is not /c/libre, FOSS related posting is tolerated, and even welcome in the case of effort posts
- 4. We believe technology should be liberating. As such, avoid promoting proprietary and/or bourgeois technology
- 5. Explanatory posts to correct the potential mistakes a comrade made in a post of their own are allowed, as long as they remain respectful
- 6. No crypto (Bitcoin, NFT, etc.) speculation, unless it is purely informative and not too cringe
- 7. Absolutely no tech bro shit. If you have a good opinion of Silicon Valley billionaires please manifest yourself so we can ban you.
founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
This is temporary, they will lose all of their infrastructure and come back to comp sci majors after the code gets completely fucked. Trust me these companies can only think in short term which is why so many times they should have lost everything but Government socialism takes care of that.
Cope, the offshored coders taking the jobs are just as good at a quarter of the pay
People are really depending on this round of offshoring going like the previous rounds, but where that failed is that by the time it was viable a lot of talent from the eastern bloc and India had been poached and working in the US. I think there’s a more conscious effort this time to not drain talent from outside the US in order to have as large of a salary gap as possible, without producing lower quality work. Also, coding is significantly easier now, like I feel programmers of the 90s to the early 00s are genuinely less replaceable than modern programmers.
Yea, companies are now opening a ton of massive offices in those foreign countries and having actual teams together now instead of trying to tightly integrate a few of them into American teams
I don't think coding became easier, it became more difficult imo but it's just more accessible and the difficulty has shifted to frameworks and massive scalable systems rather than lower level hardware knowledge. In the past only the wealthy could afford the hardware and get to know it deeply but most schmucks now can learn how to use AWS or Databricks
I feel like this is a big factor in why offshoring didn't work in the past but probably will this time
(pure speculation with no real data to back it up) like back in the early 2000s, all those indian programmers would likely have been people who purely learned in college because they didn't have a computer at home to practice, so of course they weren't that great. but now in the 20s, computers are cheap and ubiquitous enough that a significant amount of those same types of people do have computers at home, which means they'd be able to get more hands on experience and can now perform just as well as the westoids.
This doesn't account for my many peers who studied compsci with access to computers all their lives and suck at it, or some people who I met who never programmed until compsci and were great at it.
I think comp sci's difficulty parallels math. Lots of people say math is too hard but IMO it's really a matter of effort, or lack of it. Or people lack confidence that they can actually do it and then internalize the belief that they're no good at it. Also, US education sucks. But the key diff between studying math and comp sci is that for many years (and still to this day, really) programming paid extremely well and therefore attracts the gamut of people with genuine interest or talent for it to people who are only in it for the money and couldn't program a fizzbuzz without AI assistance, and everyone between.
Well sure, mere exposure doesn’t create skill. But the point I’m getting at is that without it it’s harder to get good at programming, and it’s likely increased significantly for people in poorer countries over the last couple decades. So some, maybe not all but enough, gained the ability to learn how to code the way westerners of previous generations were able to.
I suspect but don't know how to validate that it's the Indian firms overselling the savings. They could get extremely competent people by charging 60% of a western salary, paying 40% and pocketing the difference. Instead, they lowball those numbers to the point where their teams are stretched thin and don't know what they're doing, yielding bad results that are on par with all the other Indian firms doing the same thing. If capitalism worked as advertised, somebody could found NonGarbageCorp, set more realistic expectations around cost savings, attract the most competent technical remote workers, deliver great things and become immensely rich. But it would take a serious investment of capital and time to establish a reputation while western firms suspect them of secretly being GarbageCorp32849327, so the people who could pull off NonGarbageCorp just launch GarbageCorp32849327 instead.