260
submitted 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

Hey everyone.

I make Peersuite, an opensource free communication platform.

It's private by default, there's no sign-in or email collection.

It's peer-to-peer, there's no server, after discovery you are connected directly to your friends my AES-GCN encrypted WebRTC channels. It forms a mesh and identifies superpeers. Because there is no server, in order to save your data between sessions, you can download your workspace into a password encrypted file. Happy to answer any questions.

FEATURES: chat with images, PMs, channels, and file send group audio/video calling screensharing kanban board whiteboard for diagrams/flowchartswith PNG export collaborative document editing with formatted PDF export

The best way for self hosting is docker, its on dockerhub as openconstruct/peersuite. You can also download desktop versions from the github or use on the web at https://peersuite.space/

github - https://github.com/openconstruct/Peersuite

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

There is literally no way to do performant e2ee at large scale. e2ee works by encrypting every message for every recipient, on the users device.

At 1000 users, that's basically a public room.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

I haven't had a chance to test the limits of Peersuite, but since it's a mesh network, I don't think it would run well with even 100 people.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

@moonpiedumplings @jagged_circle I read your initial question as 1,000 active chat *rooms* (with some large number of users for each), which.. seems excessive. That's what I was referring to.

1,000 individual private 1-on-1 chats (or group chats with 2-3 users), if that's what you meant (and especially over a long period of time, with lots of inactive chats), seems like a more common scenario*. If that was your question, I apologize.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Lol I misread it too.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

@moonpiedumplings @jagged_circle
* I can't speak on behalf of the author, but I could imagine handling it by simply not decrypting _everything_ on startup, and only decrypting an older chat if you click on it or attempt to run a search on everything. Although for a search, I would expect some kind of hashed (and of course encrypted) database that allows a quick search of all prior messages.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 6 days ago

Everything is decrypted on exiting transit. I use WebRTC for all the data.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago

Honestly I would just copy what matrix did in 2.0

[-] [email protected] 1 points 1 week ago* (last edited 1 week ago)

I didn't say 1,000 users.

this post was submitted on 30 May 2025
260 points (96.1% liked)

Selfhosted

46672 readers
305 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS