47
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
47 points (91.2% liked)
No Stupid Questions
2797 readers
1 users here now
There is no such thing as a Stupid Question!
Don't be embarrassed of your curiosity; everyone has questions that they may feel uncomfortable asking certain people, so this place gives you a nice area not to be judged about asking it. Everyone here is willing to help.
- ex. How do I change oil
- ex. How to tie shoes
- ex. Can you cry underwater?
Reminder that the rules for lemmy.ca still apply!
Thanks for reading all of this, even if you didn't read all of this, and your eye started somewhere else, have a watermelon slice 🍉.
founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
Yeap, that's how the placebo effect works. Your brain is really good at making things happen based on expectations. Granted, they could just be an asshole and thought alcohol/drugs would give them an excuse, but my understanding is that yeah, that's the placebo effect at work.
Could they "drunk drive" if they got in their car afterwards? Could thry be charged for being impaired while not actually under the influence of anything?
It would just be reckless driving/endangerment at that point
Can they give identical penalties for it such that they were punished in the exact same way. Its an interesting notion
Some states lump it all into 'driving while impaired' which can also cover stuff like falling asleep while driving, so I'd assume it'd apply in your hypothetical.
I’m not a lawyer but I have been through the criminal system a couple of times.
They might face SOME of the same consequences if they damaged property or hit someone but they wouldn’t get a DUI.
Which is way worse
Like all legal questions, depends on the location but to answer the question generally, yes they could be charged with DUI if they fail a field sobriety test. Which doesn't always include / require a test for BAC specifically.
But if they drug tested them and there was literally no trace of substances nor alcohol and yet they're driving while "smashed". Law is very interesting, reminds me of the auto-brewer guy