29
submitted 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago) by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

LLMs can be very useful for my personal life. How can I deal with this in the future?

  • the quality highly depends on model, size, internet access, etc.
  • They get seemingly more accurate over time

Personally, I can find information within a second. I can ask it which philosopher wrote about "free will" and it'll provide me a good chunk of information that sounds very plausible. Gemini is very impressive from a layman's perspective. llama is worse in this regard but still ok. It may only be good on the surface but I can ask it for the book as well and it'll provide me information. It will get better over time.

Google already knows a lot of stuff and now it will collect even more information about people. I caught myself asking it a philosophical thought of myself.

I was asking the computer. I was not judging an output of it. I was asking to judge my output.

I was asking the computer a philosophical question that has no clear answer. I evaluated the computer's output and was happy it told me that I was right.

I also do maths with a computer. I trust it, it is usually deterministic.

I've also asked it about medical advice, which sounded good.

Today, I wanted to ask it something else, and I was observing that I ask a computer a question. I'd need many minutes, many difficult minutes to think about it. I'd need to research more information, talk to people. But I chose to prompt it.

I realised that I would need to think about this and prompt a community to think about it to exchange information by (hopefully) humans.

Using llms, especially online llms, e.g. google, yield higher quality output than local llms in my experience, hence I'd like to use online llms. But I do not want to give every question I have to google. I do not want all of us giving everything to google. Am I overreacting? Fear of new technology?

It can save me a lot of time. "I could achieve more" by using it. could I really? wouldn't the ai achieve it for me? do i want the achievement anyway? Do I want to get a headstart with ai? I write code for a living. is there a huge difference in writing deterministic code and the probabilistic llm output?

Fear of missing out is kicking in.

I do not want to get left behind but I also do not want to give up my free will.

I do not want to lose my privacy (to google).

I do not want to lose my philosophical maturity, or at least what's left of it.

Fear of missing out is kicking in.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 13 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

I also do maths with a computer. I trust it, it is usually deterministic.

I wouldn't trust it. While math is usually deterministic, language models are not. They're just spitting out whatever text is statistically likely. But that's not how math works. These programs are usually terrible at basic math like multiplication.

https://garymarcus.substack.com/p/math-is-hard-if-you-are-an-llm-and

Fear of missing out is kicking in.

Missing out on what?

[-] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago

Boost in productivity

this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
29 points (87.2% liked)

Privacy

38160 readers
271 users here now

A place to discuss privacy and freedom in the digital world.

Privacy has become a very important issue in modern society, with companies and governments constantly abusing their power, more and more people are waking up to the importance of digital privacy.

In this community everyone is welcome to post links and discuss topics related to privacy.

Some Rules

Related communities

much thanks to @gary_host_laptop for the logo design :)

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS