view the rest of the comments
Linux
Welcome to c/linux!
Welcome to our thriving Linux community! Whether you're a seasoned Linux enthusiast or just starting your journey, we're excited to have you here. Explore, learn, and collaborate with like-minded individuals who share a passion for open-source software and the endless possibilities it offers. Together, let's dive into the world of Linux and embrace the power of freedom, customization, and innovation. Enjoy your stay and feel free to join the vibrant discussions that await you!
Rules:
-
Stay on topic: Posts and discussions should be related to Linux, open source software, and related technologies.
-
Be respectful: Treat fellow community members with respect and courtesy.
-
Quality over quantity: Share informative and thought-provoking content.
-
No spam or self-promotion: Avoid excessive self-promotion or spamming.
-
No NSFW adult content
-
Follow general lemmy guidelines.
No. Though some of it can be inferred from the overtly verbose logs
No again.
Currently, most packages are built from
git HEAD
onalpine:edge
ordebian-unstable
build containers. So if the fix for this affected libwebp is shipped to the images that the build containers are based on (likely because we use edge/unstable images), then any affected packages would also automatically receive this fix.To store a complete dependency graph, we will most likely need some custom tooling because our build recipes differ wildly for each package. If you have any ideas, please open a discussion on the repo. Thanks!
Thanks for the reply.
How often do packages get rebuilt? Is it only when there's a new version? The problem in that case would be that a package that is no longer developed (or has very long release cycles) would not receive the fix.
Yes, only if there's a new version.
We specifically mark these kinds of packages as
outdated
(evendeprecated
) if they are older than 90 daysCurrently, the stats:
This will improve if we can get more builders, currently we use the free CI provided by github actions
Interesting, thanks!