2
China's alleged cyberattack on the Czech Foreign Ministry reveals the need for stronger defenses to protect national services and personal data -- [Opinion] (www.expats.cz)
submitted 3 days ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
6 comments fedilink hide all child comments

cross-posted from: https://lemmy.sdf.org/post/35554000

Archived

[...]

Chinese hackers targeted the Czech Foreign Ministry in a sophisticated cyberattack that lasted more than a year, the government said Tuesday, formally blaming Beijing for infiltrating one of the country’s most sensitive communication systems.

[...]

Foreign Minister Jan Lipavský summoned the Chinese ambassador to Prague, Feng Biao, on Tuesday morning to formally protest the cyberattack. He said the ministry’s system had long suffered from outdated technology and security flaws, which made the breach possible.

[...]

This cyberattack didn’t expose personal data but shows ongoing risks to [...] security. Outdated systems leave sensitive government info vulnerable, which could affect national security and public services. Cooperation with NATO, the EU, and allies aims to prevent future attacks and protect services like passports and healthcare. While your data wasn’t at risk this time, the breach highlights the growing need for strong cybersecurity to keep information safe.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] -2 points 3 days ago

Because the last cyberattack didn't expose personal data there is no future risk to digital security? If this is your point, it's a weird logic I would say.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 3 days ago

I've heard of whataboutism, but this is whatifism. "What if China did something bad in the future?" Then it would be bad.

The actual article title is "What the Czech-China cyber clash means for your security and privacy" - and the answer for privacy is "literally nothing." The source looks cooked, it's a site for sexpats, and there is no attributed author.

If you want to contribute to privacy discussion, why not wait for something exceptionally interesting to come around? Or, if you just want to push a universal "hey guys, China is bad" narrative (which I assume all of us already know), can you at least wait for an article with a little more meat on its bones?

[-] [email protected] -3 points 3 days ago* (last edited 3 days ago)

Once again, your comments don't make sense and don't address my comment or post. I don't understand why you have been frequently reacting so uneasy when some criticizes China. I end this discussion, it's waste of time.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 3 days ago

I'm addressing, you're just not understanding

[-] [email protected] -2 points 3 days ago

Get a job

this post was submitted on 29 May 2025
2 points (58.3% liked)

Privacy

2341 readers
717 users here now

Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.

Rules

PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!

  1. Be civil and no prejudice
  2. Don't promote big-tech software
  3. No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
  4. No reposting of news that was already posted
  5. No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
  6. No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)

Related communities:

Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.

founded 6 months ago
MODERATORS
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]
[email protected]