58
The China They Don't Want You to See: Xinjiang
(www.youtube.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 28 May 2025
58 points (87.2% liked)
Videos
6418 readers
6 users here now
Neat vids from youtube or wherever. Rules later
founded 6 years ago
MODERATORS
The decades-long occupation pretty much never works and just engenders more revolution, so I wouldn't recommend that route.
also, the "violent religious reactionaries" is a bit of a leap from the sheer volume of detainees.
I think the violent ones should be dealt with much differently than the non-violent activists, but they are apparently treated the same.
The sheer volume being how many?
absolute minimum is around half a million detainee in total (ccp numbers until 2019), and most outside estimates place the number closer to 1-2 million uyghur detainees.
Bear in mind that this is not some static equation, mass detainment started almost 10 years ago at this point and has been occurring for a decade. with detainment ongoing and the CCP long having stopped sharing specific information, it's going to be hard to get specific numbers past 2019(the half a million number) for years to come.
And where did you get those numbers?
Source?
Source?
Where did you get the half a million number?
You were able to assert "absolute minimum is around half a million" though, so you must have been able to get those specific numbers somewhere. Where did you get them?
The xinjiang high people's protectorate
Source that that's even a thing that exists?
https://web.archive.org/web/20240409125822/http://www.xj.jcy.gov.cn/jwgk/gzbg/
it's in Chinese.
every province in China has a local government, so this is the local government of xinjiang.
it's very similar to having a state government in the US.
Lmao so you lied by implying this was a separate government when it's a branch of the CPC? Sooo....are they brave truth tellers or lying chinese communists?
no, that's all still incorrect.
Sorry, this comment doesn't look like anything to me. I can only read sources
no worries.
Where did you find your link?
Also I don't see anything on that link suggesting what you're claiming.
Source that the xinjiang high people’s protectorate made all of those claims?
they are the source.
Then provide it