-8
submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Let's rewind to before that desperate (and likely spontaneous) accusation, and I'll give you another chance to reply in a normal manner.

No deflection. Just admit you didn't know LLMs scrape social media. That's all. It's okay; we don't come into this world with all of its knowledge.

[-] [email protected] -1 points 1 week ago

I actually did have a vague idea in that general direction.

But that's rather beside my point. I mean, the AI definitely offered these answers. The answers are definitely gender biased. Offering that it's merely an artifact of the LLM technology is definitely a terrible excuse for that.

And given that LLMs are well known to be tweaked to align better with the philosophical styles of the hour, doubly so.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

So, once again, you double down. No, you obviously didn't know that, and clearly still don't actually understand it, since you're claiming it was engineered to push a narrative (what narrative you won't say, but i bet it rhymes with bliss gandry).

Lastly, it's not an "excuse". It's an explanation. Calling it an "excuse" is just another attempt to deflect the answer and avoid being wrong.

[-] [email protected] -3 points 1 week ago

Well given that the bias is generally considered a bad thing, explanations absolving them of responsibility for the badness are what is generally called an "excuse".

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

It's not absolving them of responsibility. They're responsible for how they train their data - it doesn't need to be trained on social media.

this post was submitted on 25 May 2025
-8 points (30.0% liked)

Nowhere Else To Share

804 readers
3 users here now

I didn't know which community to post something in and so here we are.

Please comment if you know a more appropriate community for a post.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS