ICE denies Mahmoud Khalil from holding newborn son (en.royanews.tv)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

7 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Immigration and Customs Enforcement (ICE) prevented detained Palestinian activist and Columbia University graduate Mahmoud Khalil from holding his newborn son during a family visit, according to a report published by CBS News citing his legal team.

Khalil, 30, met his month-old baby for the first time behind a glass partition at a detention center in Louisiana, where he has been held since March. His wife, Noor Abdalla, traveled from New York for the visit, hoping for a contact meeting.

However, ICE officials and the private contractor operating the facility denied the family’s request for physical contact, citing the detention center’s no-contact visitation policy and vague "security concerns," Khalil’s lawyers said.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[-] [email protected] 2 points 1 week ago

Mahmoud Khalil, the Columbia University graduate student and lawful permanent resident who has been in immigration custody since March, got to hold his newborn for the first time Thursday at the Louisiana detention center where he is being held, his attorneys told CNN.

Source

[-] [email protected] 3 points 1 week ago

This is very confusing. NYT yesterday: https://www.nytimes.com/2025/05/21/nyregion/mahmoud-khalil-detention-hearing-baby-meeting.html

An administrator at the detention facility agreed that the couple could visit, but specified that it would be “non-contact,” meaning that the two would not be allowed to touch and could speak only through a clear divider. Mr. Khalil’s lawyers then asked for an exception so that their client could hold his newborn son. The facility again said no.

[-] [email protected] 4 points 1 week ago

That all happened yesterday.

This morning, ICE and/or the facility changed their mind. The no-glass meeting today with the attorney and wife was required by a court order. The court did not require the newborn to be admitted to the "attorney-client" meeting, but he was admitted anyway.

The legal authority for the court order was to enforce Khalil's sixth amendment right to the assistance of counsel.

this post was submitted on 22 May 2025

42 points (97.7% liked)

Progressive Politics

2647 readers

427 users here now

Welcome to Progressive Politics! A place for news updates and political discussion from a left perspective. Conservatives and centrists are welcome just try and keep it civil :)

(Sidebar still a work in progress post recommendations if you have them such as reading lists)

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]