this post was submitted on 17 May 2025
70 points (88.0% liked)
PieFed Meta
671 readers
1 users here now
Discuss PieFed project direction, provide feedback, ask questions, suggest improvements, and engage in conversations related to the platform organization, policies, features, and community dynamics.
Wiki
founded 1 year ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
I have to chime in and say this feels a bit underthought feature. I use a throwaway email for everything possible, and I would imagine a large portion of Fediverse users do that too.
I also get the motivation behind the feature. I didn't feel like throwaway addresses are worth it before I started using them. They may seem like an obvious spammer flag. But I'd say it's 50/50, just like with any free email provider like gmail or Proton mail.
Throwaway emails seem kind of necessary on small, underdeveloped, easily hacked websites.
You say it's 50/50 based on your own experience/anecdotal evidence. Admins will probably be able to make that determination with a much greater deal of accuracy based on what they see happening on their instance. So it makes sense to leave the choice to them/enable them to make that choice, right?
True, I failed to mention that I think there could be a setting to enable the feature, or dismiss the warning per-account. @[email protected] maybe consider this?
Sure
We'll see. If it turns out to be useless noise, I'll remove it from the signal.
I think it's good that it's a simple flag and not an outright block.
It's just a way for admins to see "maybe take a closer look at this registration."
I'm sure there are a lot of legitimate users that use these types of emails, though.