Technology

Well yeah, "liberal" has come to mean "progressive" or at least the Democratic Party establishment, which has drifted pretty far from OG liberals. Classical liberals restricted themselves to negative rights (freedom from), whereas modern liberals believe in positive rights (freedom to).

I consider myself a libertarian and a classical liberal. I strongly disagree with both major parties, because neither prioritizes anything I care about.

I think the issue is that the Libertarian Party does a terrible job representing libertarianism. They focus too much on the "less taxes" angle when it should be focusing on less protectionism. Here are some changes I'd like to see related to corporations:

• eliminate corporate taxes - also tax stock options/grants above some level as income (at least while we have an income tax)
• eliminate corporate liability protections above a certain size (say, $100M?)
• eliminate any explicit or implied criminal protections for corporate officers
• eliminate any tax benefits for providing benefits, and combine corporate benefit programs (e.g. 401k) with non-corporate programs accessible to all (e.g. IRA); if they offer benefits, they must also offer the cash value if the employee declines

Yet the LP focuses on the first and ignores the rest.

Don't willy nilly lump libertarians with corporate hacks. Yes, we align on a few issues, but the principles behind where we align are very different, and a libertarian would also push for a bunch of changes the corporate hacks don't want.