this post was submitted on 15 May 2025
592 points (97.1% liked)

News

29403 readers
2747 users here now

Welcome to the News community!

Rules:

1. Be civil


Attack the argument, not the person. No racism/sexism/bigotry. Good faith argumentation only. This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban. Do not respond to rule-breaking content; report it and move on.


2. All posts should contain a source (url) that is as reliable and unbiased as possible and must only contain one link.


Obvious right or left wing sources will be removed at the mods discretion. Supporting links can be added in comments or posted seperately but not to the post body.


3. No bots, spam or self-promotion.


Only approved bots, which follow the guidelines for bots set by the instance, are allowed.


4. Post titles should be the same as the article used as source.


Posts which titles don’t match the source won’t be removed, but the autoMod will notify you, and if your title misrepresents the original article, the post will be deleted. If the site changed their headline, the bot might still contact you, just ignore it, we won’t delete your post.


5. Only recent news is allowed.


Posts must be news from the most recent 30 days.


6. All posts must be news articles.


No opinion pieces, Listicles, editorials or celebrity gossip is allowed. All posts will be judged on a case-by-case basis.


7. No duplicate posts.


If a source you used was already posted by someone else, the autoMod will leave a message. Please remove your post if the autoMod is correct. If the post that matches your post is very old, we refer you to rule 5.


8. Misinformation is prohibited.


Misinformation / propaganda is strictly prohibited. Any comment or post containing or linking to misinformation will be removed. If you feel that your post has been removed in error, credible sources must be provided.


9. No link shorteners.


The auto mod will contact you if a link shortener is detected, please delete your post if they are right.


10. Don't copy entire article in your post body


For copyright reasons, you are not allowed to copy an entire article into your post body. This is an instance wide rule, that is strictly enforced in this community.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] -4 points 2 days ago (4 children)

I've never thought that anyone was selfish or pathetic for choosing not to have kids, but it's odd to suggest that it's foolish or spiteful to have kids now.

Kids now will face climate change, but their lives will be better than the vast majority of their ancestors. Imagine if your ancestors decided not to have children because they were worried about food insecurity or warring tribes or sabre-toothed tigers.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If there was a meteor about to destroy all life within a year, bringing kids into that would be widely acknowledged as unethical. Many people believe that doesn't change just because the timeframe is longer.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

There is no existential threat like a meteor though.

Sure, climate change is a big deal. It's going to cause famine and war. We need to take action to address it both in the short, medium, and long term.

However, climate change is not going to make earth uninhabitable.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 1 day ago (1 children)

The earth would be in much better shape if my ancestors decided not to have any children

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

That's indisputable.

However I think you can understand why others like myself would prefer that humankind has existed and continues to do so.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Lol yeah, cuz an unlivable planet is pretty much the same as a predator.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Suggesting the planet will be "unlivable" is hyperbole. Maybe read the article.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

I did. Did you? The authors were discussing a best-case-scenario and weren't factoring in the climate tipping point, resource wars, or any of the social effects of broadspread climate change, and even then the conclusions are pretty fucking stark. But do go on about natural predators and people fighting each other with sticks.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Lol. Go pretend to have an argument somewhere else, bud

[–] [email protected] -1 points 1 day ago
[–] [email protected] -2 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (1 children)

Ah yes, the environment being fucked, causing issues with water, weather, crops, animals, is exactly the same as if you wondered off, you might have been attacked by an animal.

Dumbest take possible. Don't have kids, you'll spread your stupidity and doom them to the climate change holocaust.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

I'm not suggesting that tigers are the same as climate change.

Merely pointing out that despite the challenges presented by climate change kids today will enjoy a must better lifestyle than almost all of their ancestors.