this post was submitted on 11 May 2025
213 points (94.6% liked)

United States | News & Politics

2857 readers
558 users here now

Welcome to [email protected], where you can share and converse about the different things happening all over/about the United States.

If you’re interested in participating, please subscribe.

Rules

Be respectful and civil. No racism/bigotry/hateful speech.

Post anything related to the United States.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (2 children)

So your argument is that Trump doesn't present himself as high and mighty? The dude had AI Photoshop him as the fucking pope...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Fascists want a strong-man leader, so yes, he and they produce photos of him with rippling muscles, riding a wind-swept horse, and while nailed to Jesus' cross all at the same time.

But they don't consider him an "elite" either. He's supposed to drain the swamp, remember? They think he's out of the establishment and will destroy the system that took affordable homes from them with his big, strong, racist muscles.

Now, I don't think any of this is inconsistent, but even if you could find one, yeah, the common person is not a well-informed, forged in the fires of philosophical rigor, politically strategic agent of the people's will—they believe a lot of irrational things. This is why the leopard eats their face so often.

The real difference between the parties is that the republicans have a story. They sell snake oil and salves to cure your ailing economy, while the Democrats sell... I mean, nothing, really. They sell the idea that things are just fine as they are, something nobody believes.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago

So it sounds like they are okay with a man being high and mighty, but a woman displaying any kind of competence or qualification is unacceptable grandstanding.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

It's almost as if what appeals to right wing voters doesn't necessarily appeal to left wing voters. Those right wing voters don't like women appearing to know more than men, but do like men who carry themselves as of they know everything and can do no wrong.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 2 days ago (1 children)

I know it wasn't you that made the point, but...

Neither Hillary nor Harris lost because they were women.

Yep... It was because they were women.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Except it wasn't, but it seems you're not here to say anything productive.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago

Except the fact that those women were very humble in comparison to the literal male embodiment of the Dunning-Kreuger effect.

If you think I'm in the wrong here, you're welcome to rise to the occasion and answer questions 1 and 2. Or you can realize you're in the wrong and quietly fade away. Pick it up.