90
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 07 May 2025
90 points (98.9% liked)
Slop.
565 readers
442 users here now
For posting all the anonymous reactionary bullshit that you can't post anywhere else.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No bigotry of any kind, including ironic bigotry.
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: Do not post public figures, these should be posted to c/El Chisme
founded 8 months ago
MODERATORS
Right? The only reason the new world was economically viable was because indigenous people molded the land to produce as much food as possible, and developed trail/road systems. It is very easy to create a self-sufficient colony in those conditions. This does not exist in space. Any project to live on another planet would require a government to take on huge expenses to build the infrastructure. Idk if anywhere else in the solar system could ever be viable for much other than robots doing resource extraction