this post was submitted on 30 Apr 2025
17 points (100.0% liked)

Canada

344 readers
22 users here now

English

This is a community dedicated to Canada and Canadians!

Rules

Links


Français

Il s'agit d'une communauté dédiée au Canada et aux Canadiens !

Règles

Liens Internet


Related Communities / Communautés associées


The community icon is the logo of the Communist Party of Canada, but this community is not affiliated with them. / L'icône de la communauté est le logo du Parti communiste du Canada, mais cette communauté n'est pas affiliée à ce parti.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

With the latest NDP defeat we're besieged by well meaning arguments on how we can save the NDP or return it to a working class party. As if that were ever the case.

The NDP was founded as a union with the Co-operative Commonwealth Federation (CCF) and the Canadian Labour Congress (CLC) in 1961. Even then, both parent organizations routinely silenced revolutionary aspirations of their members with swarming clouds of labor aristocrats determined to censor liberatory momentum with the very same careerist management/consultant parasites that dominate the Labour to NDP pipeline today. Leading to the NDP's formation, the CCF had recently caved to the red scare and replaced their revolutionary Regina Manifesto (a creed that won medicare and more) to the reformist Winnipeg Declaration which fell flat other than the "achievement" of creating the of the NDP. More disappointing, the bodies which made up the CLC had a proud history of purging socialists opposed to the Marshall Plan or NATO (also supported by the CCF), while banning entire unions they deemed as too friendly to socialism or socialist states, and eagerly imitated the American Federation of Labor’s partnership with the CIA to quietly collude with the Canadian state to suppress liberatory organizing at home and abroad.

Born from such rot, it's little wonder the NDP has brought Canadians no closer to securing the most minimal human demands of peace, land, or bread. Even while they routinely win provincial governments, the legacy of each NDP regime continues the pattern of bourgeoisie lackeyism to enforce the status quo at any cost; their most radical members serving only to redirect liberatory energy for material change into immaterial rhetorical campaigns at best. A small tasting of the exhaustive proof that the party is no instrument of the masses features the following recent lowlights:

If this is the cutting edge of Canadian class struggle, of course the Canadian worker remains insulated from class consciousness, still happy to bathe in the spoils of western imperialism and ongoing genocides of Indigenous populations backed by Canadian corporations from coast to coast to coast. Few question where their tax dollars go, fewer how their state pension grows.

From 2025 forward, that period of comfort comes to a slow and obvious end alongside the American hegemony that secured it. As the decline of American empire will continue to bring about shocks to the western economic system, it's our duty not to prop up the equally decaying liberal/social democratic structures that brought us here, but to escalate the jailbreak of masses restrained by such unscientific idylic thought. Socialism is a scientific method to assess and advance the means of production beyond the anarchy of markets and nature alike. Now is the time of monsters, and only we can save us.

If we truly seek to secure universal peace, land, and bread, our task is to elevate class-consciousness and bring that awareness to life through the establishment of rank-and-file formations rooted in the real conditions and needs of working people. We must reawaken to our responsibilities of directing unions into struggle, assemblies into decisive projects, and movements into action without asking for permission or participation from institutions with a vested interest in prolonging the status quo.

The people, and only the people, are the motive force of history. We must go to the masses, not to instruct them, but to learn and understand their needs to forge a revolutionary program from their conditions. We must form new organs of people's power: workers' councils, tenant unions, Indigenous-led land defense formations, and more configurations of class struggle independent from the ruling class. 

Our task is clear: unite the scattered, awaken the sleeping, organize the willing, and struggle without compromise. 

There are some already taking up this task, with the Communist Party of Canada being at the forefront, but we need more hands at the wheel and eyes on deck as we continue to chart what socialism with Canadian characteristics will look like.

What is the efficient implementation of mass-line process across Canada's complex communities? What is the efficient recipe for cadre education and self criticism? What is the efficient congress to bridge organizations with evolutionary momentum into a singular revolutionary movement?

Let New Democrats cling to their sinking vanity project. Let us build something new.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 7 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

In Canada, people fear communism like it's a plague.

Basing our hopes on the Canadian communist party is not a good idea.

People here are hopelessly liberal (conservative liberal or neo-liberal) and are mostly influenced by words and placated by feel-good allusions - most people I know who tells themselves are progressive are only progressive if progress can be resumed as green-cars or recycling - meaning ideas that are mostly marketing in disguise and side step the real issues.

They fear real change because it will disturb day to day functionning.

The NPD never was really popular. It's not even a true alternative to the Tory (be they red or blue) dominated landscape, and even so, it was seen as radical by a lot of people.

What we need is a rebranding, we need to use the tools that liberals can understand and they only understand marketing terms.

So we can't take terms with negative connotation to the liberal mind and use that. We can't say communism, revolution, proletariat or stuff like that.

We need to create something that will sell the ideas with new word combinations.

We could create the Competitor Party (feels liberal) which give a new idea. It's not a collective effort, it's the effort of several individuals working together, ect, ect...

[–] [email protected] 8 points 11 hours ago

Messaging absolutely matters, and you’re right that communism remains radioactive in Canadian politics. However, I'd argue that socialism cracks the door open for discussion. As living standards erode and the neoliberal center crumbles, more people are waking up to the rot. For the most part, they don't have any strong political opinions, they’re disillusioned bystanders realizing the system’s rigged against them.

The decline in material conditions is precisely what right-wing populism preys upon. The right names the pain of skyrocketing costs and dead-end jobs while wrapping solutions in familiar capitalist tropes such as immigrants steal jobs, and government stifling innovation. Their rhetoric piggybacks on decades of indoctrination, making radicalization feel common sense. It's both cynical and effective.

The left could rival this if we framed class struggle as viscerally as the right frames scapegoats. For example, healthcare for all or social security could be pitched not as compassion but as take back what’s yours from corporate thieves. Effective messaging hinges on meeting people where they are. It has to resonate with the working majority that's angry, exhausted, and done with liberal gaslighting. I think that unapologetic populist left could tap into the same anger the populist right taps into right now.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 11 hours ago* (last edited 11 hours ago)

I largely agree.

We have a non-existent level of class consciousness in the west and as people wake due to collapsing material conditions, the already conscious elements must focus on education and using palatable rhetoric to excite workers toward movements that evolve the atomized Canadian position. Establishing simple mutual aid networks could be an easy entry point (especially as the cost of living skyrockets) as could a Competitor Party, we just need class-conscious folks organizing ASAP and interconnecting to ensure best practices are shared and evolved.

To that effect, we do eventually need a clear vanguard strategically seeding a variety of movements to ensure we're expediting the evolution of each iteration of "spontaneous" movement and this will ensure an easier process of merging revolutionary momentum when we finally find the chord that excites the public into mass action. Unity -- Criticism -- Unity is most effective inside a single party committed to a mass line.

Movement is evolutionary when the progressive elements spontaneously continue their daily activities and introduce minor, quantitative changes into the old order.

Movement is revolutionary when the same elements combine, become imbued with a single idea and sweep down upon the enemy camp with the object of uprooting the old order and of introducing qualitative changes in life, of establishing a new order.

Evolution prepares for revolution and creates the ground for it; revolution consummates the process of evolution and facilitates its further activity.

Stalin, Anarchism or Socialism