this post was submitted on 13 Aug 2023
177 points (88.3% liked)

main

1337 readers
5 users here now

Default community for midwest.social. Post questions about the instance or questions you want to ask other users here.

founded 3 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Has anyone else noticed how prevalent Hexbear posters have suddenly become? Maybe sometime last week I noticed nearly every political post had at least one long thread of Hexbear users that do nothing but repeat CCP talking points while waving anyway anything even remotely reliable as Western propaganda. That or getting all excited about trolled libs. The way they tell it, you'd think everything from DW, to Fox, to Propublica, to straight up AP News articles, are all written by the same people.

Not to mention, their info on the Fediverse observer is either straight up wrong or there's some serious botting going on. According to that, the instance is less than a month old, yet somehow they already have one of the largest, most active userbases, along with far and away the most comments of any instance.

Seems to me like Lemmygrad on steroids. Considering we defederated from them, seems like a no-brainer to block Hexbear as well.

So glad this thread could become such a perfect microcosm of why we need to defederate.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (9 children)

Bots are cheap, and Lemmy is growing. It would be foolish for them not to get in on this early.

You are right, of course, that leftism != liberalism. But just saying that doesn't count as an argument. I haven't yet seen what Menachem is complaining about, but I will be paying attention.

EDIT: On further read, you guys kind of feel at the very least like the left-wing equivalent of somethingawful.com.

[–] [email protected] 105 points 1 year ago (1 children)

On further read, you guys kind of feel at the very least like the left-wing equivalent of somethingawful.com.

Oh my God that's genuinely so sweet

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm honestly not sure if I mean that as a compliment or not. They're exactly what it says on the tin, but you can't deny they're an effective bunch.

[–] [email protected] 58 points 1 year ago (1 children)

It's kind of an ironic thing to say these days considering how many leftists there are on SA.

[–] [email protected] 16 points 1 year ago

Yeah, I lurk their tg boards to read tongue in cheek white wolf rpg reviews and I can think of at least one fairly prolific poster who is definitely some kind of socialist, probably a communist.

I know literally nothing about the non-elfgames parts of the site though.

[–] [email protected] 86 points 1 year ago (1 children)

I'm explaining, not arguing.

Bots are cheap, and Lemmy is growing. It would be foolish for them not to get in on this early.

All I can say is I'm not a bot. What you want to believe is up to you.

[–] [email protected] -4 points 1 year ago (6 children)

I'm not saying you are a bot, merely that your argument is weak.

[–] [email protected] 106 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

What argument? All I've done is politely explain who we are

Jesus Christ libs really think everything is an argument to sell them something. Lmao absolute consumer brain. What capitalism does to a motherfucker. data-laughing

[–] [email protected] 106 points 1 year ago

will the debate pervertry never cease

[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 year ago

She did a strawman, she did a no true Scotsman, she did an ad hominem

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago

Purge yourself of this brain rot

[–] [email protected] 80 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (1 children)

If you want to take the issue of social media manipulation seriously, you need to take a moment to consider who is best positioned and best motivated to carry out these operations. The vast majority of the English-speaking social media platforms are headquartered in Silicon Valley, domiciled in the US. This includes TikTok. Despite all the hippie California Ideology bullshit, the Valley has been closely linked with the Pentagon since its inception (See Palo Alto by Malcom Harris, or Surveillance Valley by Yasha Levine as two examples of this history.) Today, these giant tech firms still live off the teat of military contracts. From Microsoft to Google to Amazon.

The social media platforms enjoy a regime of immense power and nil regulations. There are a lot of ways the state could cause these companies pain if it were interested, from rescinding contracts to imposing regulation, to engaging in some bona fide anti-trust litigation, but this doesn't happen because they have an understanding. These companies collaborate with the state in surveillance, they install figures like Jessica Ashooh at Reddit - straight out of the Atlantic Council - to run moderation policy. They facilitate counterinsurgency by sweeping up disclosures like the Blue Leaks and shutting down dissident communities in the midst of large scale civil unrest. They flood these platforms with war propaganda when it is convenient, lay the seeds of doubt whenever US interests are challenged abroad. They allow floods of fake users to post positively about US-aligned coups like the one in Bolivia, or the SOSCuba nonsense. We literally have military formations who's sole task is to manipulate opinion on social media.

These are the people manipulating public opinion on social media. They are the ones holding the keys to the platforms. The ones who DECIDE what the algorithm is going to show you day after day after day. The ones who let shitholes like r/The_Donald to run roughshod for years, then ban communities like r/ChapoTrapHouse in the middle of the biggest domestic protest movement in US history. The ones who remove moderators from places like r/PresidentialRaceMemes and replace them with ideologues from r/Neoliberal to ensure the website closes ranks against the most underwhelming candidate and political vision conceivable for the moment.

Seriously consider the power held by the people operating these platforms. What they believe. What their material interests are. Who they network with. Who they do business with. What constraints exist to severely punish them if they undermine the interests of state. Consider that, and balance that against the overblown panic about foreign influence bots. Which one do you think has a bigger impact?

States are massive, chaotic social systems. I'm not going to say that foreign influence ops don't occur, because within each state there are competing factions with different interests. But consider China is much more concerned with domestic conditions within their country than they are about what a bunch of Redditors, who they have blocked, think about them anyway. Consider the same about Russia. Consider the disparity in power these countries have to manipulate infrastructure owned and operated in the United States compared to the people who actually own it, and the state agencies which have the jurisdiction to destroy these firms if they step out of line.

[–] [email protected] 38 points 1 year ago

Saving this one.

[–] [email protected] 68 points 1 year ago

first and second off lmfao

third off yeah im pretty sure a plurality of users here are veterans in their late 20s to early 30s of the mid-2000s cultural miasma

[–] [email protected] 49 points 1 year ago
Exception in thread "main" IllegalArgumentException: 23
at parseLlamaTokens.main(parseLlamaTokens.java:28)
[–] [email protected] 46 points 1 year ago

There's definitely a lot of SomethingAwful influence in our culture. /R/chapotraphouse, the subreddit whose banning spawned our website, had a ton of that energy too.

[–] [email protected] 21 points 1 year ago

it do smell like :10bux: in here

[–] [email protected] 8 points 1 year ago

But to Complicated for th West to use , CIA simply doesnt have the Budget... Only Iran does !