▲ 143 ▼ Chinese Room 2 (By Lumsel) (pawb.social) submitted 1 year ago by ThefuzzyFurryComrade@pawb.social [M] to c/fuck_ai@lemmy.world 10 comments fedilink hide all child comments Source (Tumblr), alternate frontend
[+] desktop_user@lemmy.blahaj.zone -13 points 1 year ago (2 children) Yes? this is common knowledge. permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 36 points 1 year ago (1 child) No, many people believe that chatgpt is intelligent in the way humans are permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Those people are very silly. It wouldn't be intelligent the way humans are, it would be intelligent the way a computer is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago (1 child) "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.” ― Edsger W. Dijkstra permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago "The ability to quote is a suitable substitute for wit" - Ghandi permalink fedilink source parent [–] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) Not if you are part of the AI-bros club. There is a reason Marketing agencies insist in using the term Artificial Intelligence. Unfortunately, this is not common knowledge, as experts and Marketing Agencies explain Machine Learning to the masses by saying that "It looks at the data and learns from it, like a human would", which combined with the name Artificial Intelligence and the other terms, like Neural Networks and Machine Learning can make someone think these things are actually intelligent. Furthermore, we, humans, can see humanity where there is none. We can see faces where there are no faces, we can empathize with things that aren't even alive. So, when this thing shows up, which is capable of creating somewhat coherent text, people are quick to Anthropomorphize the machine. To add to this, we are also very language focused: If someone is really good with the language they speak, they are usually seen as more intelligent. And finally, never underestimate tech illiteracy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BigRigButters@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago Who cares lol they’re gonna do whatever they want regardless permalink fedilink source parent
[–] crmsnbleyd@sopuli.xyz 36 points 1 year ago (1 child) No, many people believe that chatgpt is intelligent in the way humans are permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Those people are very silly. It wouldn't be intelligent the way humans are, it would be intelligent the way a computer is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago (1 child) "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.” ― Edsger W. Dijkstra permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago "The ability to quote is a suitable substitute for wit" - Ghandi permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 0 points 1 year ago (1 child) Those people are very silly. It wouldn't be intelligent the way humans are, it would be intelligent the way a computer is. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago (1 child) "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.” ― Edsger W. Dijkstra permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago "The ability to quote is a suitable substitute for wit" - Ghandi permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DarkDarkHouse@lemmy.sdf.org 15 points 1 year ago (1 child) "The question of whether a computer can think is no more interesting than the question of whether a submarine can swim.” ― Edsger W. Dijkstra permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago "The ability to quote is a suitable substitute for wit" - Ghandi permalink fedilink source parent
[–] DragonTypeWyvern@midwest.social 3 points 1 year ago "The ability to quote is a suitable substitute for wit" - Ghandi permalink fedilink source parent
[–] prototype_g2@lemmy.ml 13 points 1 year ago (1 child) Not if you are part of the AI-bros club. There is a reason Marketing agencies insist in using the term Artificial Intelligence. Unfortunately, this is not common knowledge, as experts and Marketing Agencies explain Machine Learning to the masses by saying that "It looks at the data and learns from it, like a human would", which combined with the name Artificial Intelligence and the other terms, like Neural Networks and Machine Learning can make someone think these things are actually intelligent. Furthermore, we, humans, can see humanity where there is none. We can see faces where there are no faces, we can empathize with things that aren't even alive. So, when this thing shows up, which is capable of creating somewhat coherent text, people are quick to Anthropomorphize the machine. To add to this, we are also very language focused: If someone is really good with the language they speak, they are usually seen as more intelligent. And finally, never underestimate tech illiteracy. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] BigRigButters@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago Who cares lol they’re gonna do whatever they want regardless permalink fedilink source parent
[–] BigRigButters@lemm.ee 0 points 1 year ago Who cares lol they’re gonna do whatever they want regardless permalink fedilink source parent