this post was submitted on 25 Apr 2025
141 points (94.9% liked)
FediLore + Fedidrama
2826 readers
34 users here now
Rules
- Any drama must be posted as an observer, you cannot post drama that you are involved with.
- When posting screenshots of drama, you must obscure the identity of all the participants.
- The poster must have a credible post and comment history before submitting a piece of history. This is to avoid sock-puppetry and witch hunts.
The usual instance-wide rules also apply.
Chronicle the life and tale of the fediverse (+ matrix)
Largely a sublemmy about capturing drama, from fediverse spanning drama to just lemmy drama.
Includes lore like how a instance got it's name, how an instance got defederated, how an admin got doxxed, fedihistory etc
(New) This sub's intentions is to an archive/newspaper, as in preferably don't get into fights with each other or the ppl featured in the drama
Tags: fediverse news, lemmy news, lemmyverse
Partners:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
"These people"
For crying out loud.
Children *
Boy
That doesn't make it better.
It makes it more smug and condescending.
You picked two words from comment and ignored the thesis...
You expect me to play ball?
No, no, the only thing I expect of you is smugness and condescension. It's pretty much all you ever do.
Seriously, go back through your own user history. Read it like someone else would if they stumbled across you randomly. I'm not saying you have to change, but don't pretend you're not just running around lemmy swinging dick.
Everyone has patterns. We all fall into habits, ways of saying things, word choices. Yours are consistently nasty, even when there's no point to being so.
Thing is, behind all of that nastiness and condescension seems to be a person with some degree of passion. But it's buried so deep that it eventually just becomes tiresome to keep trying to find the human in there. It comes off like you're just trying to fuck with people. If that's your goal, keep at it. If it isn't? Maybe slow down some and consider the outcomes of your choices.
Read The Parable of the Nazi Bar.
How is this relevant?
Did you read the alleged offending text? It's not transphobic, let alone Nazi.
Sorry, who is Leni?
I wouldn't leave it to just trolling and illegal stuff. Spamming obvious propaganda, shitting up a digital space with dumb bullshit (doesn't have to political, just distracting and irrelevant), commercial spam, baiting users to piss them off. There are many situations were mod actions are justified.
But this is definitely not the case.
Not sure why you're bringing me into this. First, I'm not, and never have been, transphobic. My gf is transgender and beautiful. Secondly, I don't even know this Leni person.
Feel free to hate me, but do you really have to bring up my name every single time someone says something controversial?
Besides, I never even did anything controversial except vote for the Socialist candidate instead of Democratic candidate in the election. Only fucking Lemmy would call that controversial.
I stand by my voting record. You all are obsessed! lol
Sure, but the comment (which has since been removed by mod for witch-hunting) bizarrely brought up my name in the conversation. I didn't ban Leni, nor do I have anything to do with Leni.
It was just a bizarre name drop that had nothing to do with the discussion. I'm not involved in any of the dealings in this thread or the OP.
Thanks for the context.
Now I truly understand why the individual was referred to as a clown. 🤣
Someone who has had a mix of things in her past that she regrets but made up for and things that are easy to take out of context or exaggerate (and who has had people follow her everywhere who don't care which is which because they want to blemish her as much as possible), with many of the examples you were given having been removed by rule enforcers on the basis of going against genuineness, if that serves to indicate you fell for others' dishonesty.
https://thebrainbin.org/u/@[email protected]
Leni is another hadnle that's easier to spell
I think trolling covers most of what you listed but I definitely missed commercial spam. I forgot about since this ain't reddit. But yeah that's definitely deserves a ban.
Got it.
Yeah, I guess most of what I listed does fall under trolling.
I just hope other instances don't follow BLZ on this issue. It is completely unjustified.
How have I done any of that?
I don't think you are trolling. You are just off. Hence why I do not support you being censored.
You should have the ability to express yourself if this is your real opinions. Content itself is clown grade tho
May I ask how so?
https://lemmy.world/post/25415423/15694987
This covers your body of work extensively.
For me personally, seeing youu take these asinine positions while getting your panties bunched over st Luigi doing lords work.
There not logical coherence to much of it either, well except for bootlicking the rich
It moreso covers how many of you will take things out of context. I can't even say a Chuck Norris joke without someone claiming Chuck Norris is a Nazi simply for not agreeing with the local masses. My position is that, when it comes to what someone is going for, the mind behind an act or gesture matters, not the minds observing an act or gesture. Before the autism registry in America seems to have been cancelled (let's hope this is true), I have recently gone on record as saying RFK has been acting very Nazi-esque, so I am definitely against Nazism and I am definitely not against bringing them or their atrocities up. However, there comes a point where making the accusation is premature. You could say I deconstruct it into two categories, "de jure" (as in, the person identifies as a Nazi, think Kanye West's rants) and "de facto" (the person inherits the philosophical traits of Nazis), and so someone saying "that person is a Republican, thus they're a Nazi" is not something I understand. I do not violate any TOS by trying to elaborate my approach.
For both of the things you allude to, I could take a few approaches when trying to verify myself. I could go by Snopes. I could repeat what the encyclopedias say. I could consult an AI. I could consult a Q&A service. And I could also check something akin to Ground News. I have done all of these. Most of the time, if they agreed with the person I'm arguing with, they'd be quoted. Here, they're not. I'm the one quoting them in these matters. I dedicate myself to trying to steer clear of falsehoods, and here I am, at odds with a majority who have suddenly abandoned these in a way that, to some, might resemble appeal to the masses based on convenience. As for the other matters about me you linked to, they are misconstrued in other ways, such as the part where it claims I chatted with someone in a place I couldn't have because I was banned from there at the time, and this too brings into question your claim about discussion being the best modus operandi for dealing with claims. Not because it's not true, but because here you are showing how powerless it is. I had just about forgotten there ever was an issue until, out of nowhere, people like you just randomly decided to bring my name up here. I am not a populist. Deal with it.
In case you haven't noticed, I'm not relevant to any of this either. You're the first person to bring me up and what all this hoopla about me right now is based on. I'm not sure how someone is a clown for sticking to values she is always willing to discuss.
That doesn't mean everyone telling you to stop overreacting is a fascist.
There is one for a boy who cried wolf ;)
Other of Aesop's Fables you should read:
The Wolf in Sheep's Clothing
The Four Oxen and the Lion
The One-Eyed Doe
The Wolf and the Kid
The Horse, Hunter, and Stag
What is it with you and your grudge against me? All because I listened to people higher than me and temporarily removed you from a community for trying to dog whistle that Luigi guy (or is this based on year-old claims that have fallen apart in the face of discussion). You're not even removed anymore, so who again is demonstrating what kind of demeanor here?
Your record speaks for itself dear but I never demand you being censored
In a world where misinformation justifies itself that way and where you have indeed existentially rallied against me on multiple occasions, both parts of what you just said are debatable.
That's how a discussion works
People can make up their own opinions based on what is presented
A statement which directly challenges and is challenged by your earlier one that "my records speak for themselves".
Correct. Your content borders on incoherent at best.
For someone who so often brings up the power of discussion, if that was a concern of yours (it isn't an issue a lot of other people have), I'm surprised you aren't one to simply ask "what does X part mean" when you are stumped.
We already went through this
https://thebrainbin.org/m/[email protected]/t/529185/-/comment/4610342
What you refer to is not what you would call asking about what someone means.
You left 50+ comments in this thread defending Elon Musk and the infamous AfD party known for its nazi rhetoric, even after being shown official posters from the AfD party which had nazi salutes in them. You abused mod powers before you were removed as a mod.
When UniversalMonk got banned you made these types of comments, repeatedly.
https://lemmy.world/modlog?page=1&actionType=All&userId=999488
"Joined 6 days ago"