979
submitted 2 months ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

Thats socialism, which is meant to lead eventually to communism. The end goal is to have no state.

If my understanding is correct, that is.

[-] [email protected] 16 points 2 months ago

To be fair 🤓 since it's mostly theoretical, any definition of communism is going to be in flux as it has not achieved a shelf-stable real life application yet.

[-] [email protected] 1 points 2 months ago

It's shelf stable in the same way as a clay pigeon.

[-] [email protected] 3 points 2 months ago

yeah, Lenin even stated this was the end-goal.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

I don't think it's possible for a state to give up power.

[-] [email protected] 2 points 2 months ago

it's one of those things a lot of thought's been put into and commies themselves argue about. i feel it's great to conceptualize (and with it the differing definitions of "the state" as well) but i'm not a scholar anyway, this ain't the place, and it's moot since socialism needs to be achieved first anyway, after we beat this whole fascism thing. no point in worrying to much about it eh?

this post was submitted on 23 Apr 2025
979 points (97.9% liked)

Facepalm

3303 readers
1 users here now

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS