this post was submitted on 21 Apr 2025
196 points (97.1% liked)

Selfhosted

46212 readers
276 users here now

A place to share alternatives to popular online services that can be self-hosted without giving up privacy or locking you into a service you don't control.

Rules:

  1. Be civil: we're here to support and learn from one another. Insults won't be tolerated. Flame wars are frowned upon.

  2. No spam posting.

  3. Posts have to be centered around self-hosting. There are other communities for discussing hardware or home computing. If it's not obvious why your post topic revolves around selfhosting, please include details to make it clear.

  4. Don't duplicate the full text of your blog or github here. Just post the link for folks to click.

  5. Submission headline should match the article title (don’t cherry-pick information from the title to fit your agenda).

  6. No trolling.

Resources:

Any issues on the community? Report it using the report flag.

Questions? DM the mods!

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 13 points 2 days ago (2 children)

More reliable

Heavily depends. If you want to use it as long-term cold storage you absolutely should not use SSDs, they're losing data when left unpowered for too long. While HDDs are also not perfect in retaining data forever, they won't fail as quickly when left on a shelf.

[–] [email protected] 7 points 2 days ago (1 children)

Good and true point, but arguably most NASs are built to be used, not to be not-used…

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Well, they arguably can also be used as one big long-term storage. Not sure who'd need to save so much data for a long time, but there surely will be at least some people who do and buy the "modern solution" over old HDDs thinking they're better in general. As the "family backup" for example, or as cold storage solution in faculties that can be quickly accessed if needed.

Read somewhere about a professor who used SSDs to "permanently" store important data on SSDs (perhaps in the comments of the article above) for a few years. Well, wasn't that permanent…

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

HDDs die faster when running because they have to spin though.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (1 children)

To my knowledge it isn't them constantly running that wears them out most, but spinning up and down very often. Weren't NAS drives designed to never spin down for that very reason?

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago

This is partially true but SSD's do not spin at all.

I have had many a NAS drive fail on me in the past.