librehab

271 readers

1 users here now

"LibRehab" is a place to point people to when they showcase clear signs of Liberalism (not in a mean way). It is also a place to proactively destroy your liberalism before it becomes counterrevolutionary.

Posts here should be a mix of simplified theory, countering of historical revisionism / anti-communist talking points, and a nonjudgmental space for those on the journey of deprogramming their mind.

founded 1 year ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

What would you tell your liberal self? (hexbear.net)

submitted 1 year ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

45 comments fedilink hide all child comments

While none of us were precisely born as liberals, the vast majority of us were raised as such.

If you could reach back in time to the past version of you that remained under the illusions of liberalism, what would you say?

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Additionally, the realization that democratic rights in liberal democracies are limited: democracy isn't allowed in matters of private property.

People are free, decision-making is democratic. Ok, so can we vote Rockefeller's wealth away from him? No, don't be ridiculous.

Sure, it's great to have democracy for municipal services, taxes, etc., but let's also have it for the means of production like they have in Chiapas.

I've always thought poverty is the biggest problem in the world. Sure human rights issues are bad, incurable cancers are bad, but Poverty, that's the 800lb gorilla of human problems. Road traffic accidents are bad because they cause 2% of deaths. Poverty causes 50% of human deaths. So the fact that material wealth is non-democratic, oligarchic, that's a big deal. You can't say, "Ah well, it'd be nice to have fair distribution, but at least we have free speech for all". That's a much lesser right. Material wealth is the most important right.