this post was submitted on 11 Aug 2023
89 points (100.0% liked)

the_dunk_tank

15880 readers
354 users here now

It's the dunk tank.

This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.

Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.

Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.

Rule 3: No sectarianism.

Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome

Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)

Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.

Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.

Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]

Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
 

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 31 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (22 children)

Some other countries are always worth fighting against though, and Russia is one of them.

lmao heres the admission that this entire bloody mess is a proxy war between the West (america) and Russia..

Oh yeah totally, they don't need to fight Russia, they should just give up and let Russians do what they did in Bucha to the whole country. Of course Russians are known to peacefully incorporate conquered territories with no harm done whatsoever to civilians.

...and heres the attribution of war crimes not to the savage nature of war and armed, violent conscripts, but to the inferior nature of "LE RUSSIAN PEOPLES, SUBHUMAN ORK LE BAD!"

inb4 "MUH WARCIMES DENIAL"

nah I'm not denything Russian troops committed warcrimes, but I'm not going to attribute that to some innate savagery of the Russian people, this disgusting bullshit is the result of the war itself, and we sure as hell know that Russia was not solely responsible for the current conflict (EU stabbed the bear with EuroMaidan).

Theres also the false equivalence of the war ending peacefully, full withdrawals from both sides, with negotiations between Russia and Ukraine, and the war ending with Ukraine's lands being raped and pillaged by out of control asiatic hordes (classic fascist warmongering propaganda).

All in all this post is peak racist virtue signalling and hypocrisy typed in all likelihood by Ameri~~fat~~can hands.

I'll put it to you in a way that your teenage mind can comprehend: We're with Thorfinn in that violence is le bad. ~~Now fuck off to McDonald etc. etc.~~

Edit: Sorry to all fat people for associating you with child killing imperialist wastes of oxygen.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 year ago (21 children)

Miss all on accounts my man. I'm Polish and we know full well what it means to live under Russian rule. We remember September 1939 backstab and 1944-45 campaign of bringing freedom by Soviets. My family on all imaginable sides has suffered significant loss from those. Time passes but Russian soldiers somehow behave the same, as proven by the current conflict. So maybe there's more to it than just "armed conscripts", I don't know what it is exactly, but I do fully associate that with Russians. Feel free to call me racist for that, comes out fairly funny given Poles and Russians are Slavs.

Oh and conscripts you say? Didn't Russians claim it's fully professional army back then? So maybe it's a matter of training. I also don't think what happened at Bucha can be attributed to actions of a few rogue conscripts, it had to come from a higher level of command.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (5 children)

Would you have preferred that Poland exist under indefinite Nazi occupation? If Poland is the best route from one to the other and the Nazis have an existential enemy in the Soviets, the military is going to cross over one way or another. Speaking not for the state of Poland (fuck them, those Holocaust collaborators) but for the people (minorities particularly), it is much better to get at least some insulation from the Nazi genocide via the Soviet occupation rather than, what? Another year or two before the Nazis invade and this time take over the entire country with zero state effort to protect vulnerable populations first and much less hope of the Soviets ultimately defeating them? It just doesn't make sense to me.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago (4 children)

Insulation from Nazi genocide, as if hundreds of thousands of Poles were not sent to Syberia and Katyń didn't happen. As if Soviets didn't collaborate with Nazis forming the Ribbentrop - Molotov pact. Soviets are perpetrators of WW2 in the same way Nazis are. It's just Stalin got backstabbed by Hitler the same way he stabbed Poland in the back in 1939.

I also wonder what exactly do you mean by Polish state being Holocaust collaborators? You do realize there was no Polish state under Nazi / Soviet occupation, except for the London one? How could it have collaborated in Holocaust?

People were right though, hexbear is just a Russian propaganda tube. I don't know if you people are paid to do this subhuman work or are you really believe in this alt history bullshit you're spreading, I feel sorry for you one way or the other.

[–] [email protected] 24 points 1 year ago

As if Soviets didn't collaborate with Nazis forming the Ribbentrop - Molotov pact.

The pact was the correct move after the western powers (and Poland, afaik) refused to more proactively join the Soviets in crushing the Nazis. The Soviets could not defeat the Nazis without being able to actually reach them on land and the Soviets could not defeat the Nazis if war started then and they were alone (as the western powers hoped would happen). Given the western powers not taking the Nazi threat seriously and the geopolitical implications of that, the pact was entirely correct.

It's just Stalin got backstabbed by Hitler the same way he stabbed Poland in the back in 1939.

Stalin identified (what I've usually seen translated as) "Hitlerism" as the immediate mortal enemy of the Soviets since well before the pact. Incidentally, Hitler also publically identified the Soviets as mortal enemies of the Nazis, making all sorts of accusations about "Judeo-Bolshevism". These two governments were not allies and it's an abomination of historical revision to characterize it as such.

Stalin expected Hitler to violate the pact eventually, since the Soviets gained tremendous advantage from stalling and developing their semi-feudal infrastructure into something more modern. He did not, however, expect the Nazis to invade as soon as they did, was caught very unprepared, and suffered horrible losses both of soldiers and civilians (in Poland and the USSR proper) as a result. That last part is something that should be criticized, but you cannot criticize his actual errors coherently in the fantasy framework of him and Hitler being teammates.

I also wonder what exactly do you mean by Polish state being Holocaust collaborators? You do realize there was no Polish state under Nazi / Soviet occupation, except for the London one? How could it have collaborated in Holocaust?

https://www.newyorker.com/news/our-columnists/the-historians-under-attack-for-exploring-polands-role-in-the-holocaust

It's illegal in Poland to make claims like this, so it would not surprise me if you aren't very familiar, but on a municipal level there absolutely was collaboration between existing Polish government officials and the Nazis.

Here's another article from the most Atlanticist source you can find in journalism: https://www.theatlantic.com/international/archive/2018/02/poland-holocaust-death-camps/552455/

People were right though, hexbear is just a Russian propaganda tube. I don't know if you people are paid to do this subhuman work or are you really believe in this alt history bullshit you're spreading, I feel sorry for you one way or the other.

If my quotes denote sections (with this being the fourth), then the first section of this comment (that the pact was correct) is a claim that isn't very popular in western historiography but definitely is present. The second and third sections (Stalin and Hitler were always enemies, that the Polish government collaborated in the Holocaust) are the standard position in western historiography even though the Stalin/Hitler one gets distorted in pop history. In countries like Poland and Ukraine, these positions are much less common in part because of reactionary campaigns by those governments to revise history in the direction of Holocaust denial (see section three of my comment and Banderites in Ukraine, respectively).

Nothing I've said here is in the realm of a crank opinion to mainstream western historians. I can expand on the western powers not being interested in stopping the Nazis until it became a direct need for their own survival, but it felt like too much of a tangent.

[–] [email protected] 23 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

Soviets are perpetrators of WW2 in the same way Nazis are.

Starting the Holocaust both-sides Ending the Holocaust

Get lost, cryptofascist

[–] [email protected] 17 points 1 year ago

Poland literally refused to ally with the Soviets, did imperialism by trying to restore the PLC during the 1920 war, prevented the soviets from aiding german & Hungarian communists, betrayed Czechoslovakia by seizing territory in accord with hitler and did an aforementioned non-aggression pact with the funni mustache guy. Poland literally did everything it could to alienate itself from allies and torpedo its own country. Poles still try to desperately become the next member of the cracker country club and which always will/has ended in their OWN country being destroyed.

load more comments (15 replies)
load more comments (15 replies)