you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 1 year ago (16 children)

Invention that will seem obvious after it's introduced: a phone camera that can film in landscape while being held vertically.

Invention that's not obvious but I'm sure it's a brilliant idea: edible, bacon-flavored wrapping paper so that pets can open their own presents!

  • source
  • hideshow 16 child comments
  • [–] [S] 19 points 1 year ago (13 children)

    Invention that will seem obvious after it's introduced: a phone camera that can film in landscape while being held vertically.

    Why don't we have this??

    People turning their phones to film in landscape will probably be one of those things that'll look silly in old media once this is changed.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 13 child comments
  • [–] 20 points 1 year ago* (10 children)

    Increases the hardware pixel count by ~1.6x while being wasted every shot.

    Just turn your fucking phone.

    That being said, half our phones have like 3 cameras on the back we don't use, so sure, throw a fourth on, why not?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 10 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (7 children)

    It wouldn't. It would just switch the orientation of the camera. The preview/what you're looking at would remain in portrait mode.

    It's literally a software problem. You don't use a different camera when you go into landscape mode, you're just using a different aspect ratio.

    So again, why don't we have this?

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 7 child comments
  • [–] 10 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    But the camera sensor is a rectangle, right? So you could do it with software, but you would lose resolution because the sensor isn't as wide in that direction. You'd just be cropping the image.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago)

    I think you're right that it's related to it being a rectangle and without changing the sensor shape it'd be basically a crop in software.

    The cameras are round though so it's only the capture hardware that would need to be fixed. The "megapixel" of the camera constantly increases as well so dropping some of it in a crop may not even matter much in the long run.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 5 points 1 year ago (2 children)

    What @dave@lemmy.nz said.

    Although we could just use a square matrix.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
  • [–] 4 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    I'm assuming the reasons we don't use a square are cost and space. Phones are pretty tightly packed in, every 1mm width you add probably has flow on effects for other things you can't have.

    And I am not sure what the limiting factor is but if you add a bunch more light sensors to make it square I'm assuming that comes with additional cost, not just the sensors but now you need to connect up a bunch more to whatever controls it which then might need more processing power or smaller connectors or some other flow on impact.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago

    Oh yes, absolutely, to everything you've said. Every pixel on the matrix has to be wired up individually. My only argument would be that we've already reached ridiculous resolutions on phones - might as well plop a square sensor in.

  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 3 points 1 year ago* (1 child)

    i think its not about the camera, but about the screen you are seeing the recording on. Imagine taking a video in landscape but having to check what you are recording in portrait. What would i want that disadvantage for?

    Btw i find the many people who watch wide screen videos in portrait mode fucked up.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago (1 child)

    Some phones do have four cameras on now. God knows what they all do.

  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
  • [–] 2 points 1 year ago

    I’m pretty sure that the multiple cameras all have different focal lengths, which allows the software to composite a single image from the multiple signals. This allows the intersecting fields to enhance quality when zooming and discriminate smudges/dust that you wouldn’t want to be in the shot.

  • source
  • parent