this post was submitted on 15 Apr 2025
31 points (94.3% liked)

Broligarchy Watch

264 readers
41 users here now

(neologism, politics) A small group of ultrawealthy men who exert inordinate control or influence within a political structure, particularly while espousing views regarded as anti-democratic, technofascist, and masculinist.

Wiktionary

The shit is hitting the fan at such a high rate that it can be difficult to keep up. So this is a place to share such news.

Elsewhere in the Fediverse:

founded 1 month ago
MODERATORS
 

The big American tech firms known as the “Silicon Six” have been accused of paying almost $278bn (£211bn) less corporate income tax in the past decade compared with the statutory rate for US companies making the same profits.

Amazon, Meta, Alphabet, Netflix, Apple and Microsoft generated $11tn of revenue and $2.5tn of profits over the past 10 years.

Yet they paid an average 18.8% in combined national and federal corporation taxes, compared with an average 29.7% in the US, according to the Fair Tax Foundation (FTF), which said the Silicon Six had “hardwired” tax avoidance into their business models.

Analysis by the not-for-profit organisation found that if one-off repatriation tax payments in the US connected to historical tax avoidance were excluded, the average corporate income tax contribution of the six firms fell to 16.1% over the past decade.

The companies had also inflated their stated tax payments by $82bn over the same period by including contingencies for tax they did not expect to pay, the report claimed.

Paul Monaghan, the chief executive of the FTF, said: “Our analysis would indicate that tax avoidance continues to be hardwired into corporate structures. The Silicon Six’s corporate income tax contributions are, in percentage terms, way below what sectors such as banking and energy are paying in many parts of the world.”

Monaghan pointed to “aggressive tax practices” such as the contingency tax positions, while the companies also exerted “enormous political influence as well as economic power”, spending millions of dollars on lobbying governments.

The report comes as the US tech companies’ influence has been highlighted by the presence of their bosses including Amazon’s Jeff Bezos, Apple’s Tim Cook and Meta’s Mark Zuckerberg at Donald Trump’s second inauguration.

A significant tax cut for such companies has reportedly been at the heart of discussions with the UK in its attempts to secure lower tariffs on its products exported to the US.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 23 hours ago (1 children)

What I suspect you're identifying is the loophole whereby wealthy individuals hold on to stocks to avoid taxable events. They then take out a loan with the stocks as collateral. The bank charges a small % because the risk to them is tiny. Thus it's far cheaper for the individual than simply paying the capital gains.

Why are you so ardent to defend taxing billionaires?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 22 hours ago

Why are you so ardent to defend taxing billionaires?

Please, be more charitable than that.

My argument is not that we shouldn’t make wealthy people pay their fair share. It’s that tax avoidance isn’t a trivial problem to solve. It’s actually very complicated because people are smart in general and they generally always try to minimize the taxes they pay.

This is half of the reason the entire accounting profession exists (the other half in auditing)! When one tax loophole is discovered, an accounting firm can put it to work for all of their clients.

What I suspect you're identifying is the loophole whereby wealthy individuals hold on to stocks to avoid taxable events. They then take out a loan with the stocks as collateral. The bank charges a small % because the risk to them is tiny. Thus it's far cheaper for the individual than simply paying the capital gains.

Yes, though it’s not just billionaires who do this. Regular people do this as well. And they don’t just do this with stocks and bonds, they do it with real estate. Reverse mortgages, home equity lines of credit, rental properties, etc!

If you own a million dollars worth of stocks and bonds you can use that as collateral for a loan to help you make the down payment on a new mortgage. Then you can convert that property into a rental and use the rental income to pay off the loan as well as make mortgage payments. Or you could use the loan to help you start a small business.

There’s just so much people can do when they have access to capital. Our whole economy is based on it.