No you understand it perfectly. The entire point is to make it harder for people to vote.

So, you do understand this legislation, because that's the point.

It makes it notably harder for:

• full-time unskilled/low-skilled workers (particularly those that don't have lenient schedules for non-work obligations that have to happen during working hours, like dealing with City Hall)

• people who live far away from where they were born

• people with limited transportation options

• married women who changed their name (name no longer matches birth certificate)

• transfolk whose birth certificate reflects their deadname.

Basically...Democrats. Or at least a hell of a lot more Democrats than Republicans.

Sounds like you understand the legislation perfectly well.

That is the point. They know that they’re going to get fucking wrecked in any fair election going forward. Obviously, the solution is to make elections unfair by making it way harder to vote and way easier to challenge voter validity - a problem that, I should emphasize, is vanishingly rare. In fact, the highest incidence of voter fraud in recent years has come from Republican voters.

I don’t understand this legislation at all.

Republicans can only win by utilizing two strategies.

Misinformation and voter suppression.

The point is that you need to be able to prove you're a citizen. The WH get to decide what is accepted a proof.

Putting up barriers to committing a crime is more effective than punishment after the fact. It's already illegal to commit crimes with firearms, that doesn't mean they should repeal the Brady Bill. This also undermines the narratives about muh stolen election.