this post was submitted on 07 Apr 2025
15 points (89.5% liked)
Casual Conversation
3032 readers
200 users here now
Share a story, ask a question, or start a conversation about (almost) anything you desire. Maybe you'll make some friends in the process.
RULES (updated 01/22/25)
- Be respectful: no harassment, hate speech, bigotry, and/or trolling. To be concise, disrespect is defined by escalation.
- Encourage conversation in your OP. This means including heavily implicative subject matter when you can and also engaging in your thread when possible. You won't be punished for trying.
- Avoid controversial topics (politics or societal debates come to mind, though we are not saying not to talk about anything that resembles these). There's a guide in the protocol book offered as a mod model that can be used for that; it's vague until you realize it was made for things like the rule in question. At least four purple answers must apply to a "controversial" message for it to be allowed.
- Keep it clean and SFW: No illegal content or anything gross and inappropriate. A rule of thumb is if a recording of a conversation put on another platform would get someone a COPPA violation response, that exact exchange should be avoided when possible.
- No solicitation such as ads, promotional content, spam, surveys etc. The chart redirected to above applies to spam material as well, which is one of the reasons its wording is vague, as it applies to a few things. Again, a "spammy" message must be applicable to four purple answers before it's allowed.
- Respect privacy as well as truth: Don’t ask for or share any personal information or slander anyone. A rule of thumb is if something is enough info to go by that it "would be a copyright violation if the info was art" as another group put it, or that it alone can be used to narrow someone down to 150 physical humans (Dunbar's Number) or less, it's considered an excess breach of privacy. Slander is defined by intentional utilitarian misguidance at the expense (positive or negative) of a sentient entity. This often links back to or mixes with rule one, which implies, for example, that even something that is true can still amount to what slander is trying to achieve, and that will be looked down upon.
Casual conversation communities:
Related discussion-focused communities
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
Patrick.
He was the only one on the lab tech team who realized that "core working hours are 10-13" meant you can actually come at 9 and it's ok and did so because it worked better for him. My colleagues always bullied me for coming between 8 and 9 (him to a lesser extend). Even at 7:30 I was "the late one". They all started between 4:30 am and 6:30 am. But the project managers actually hated that because they, as everyone outside the lab technician team, started around 9. And most techs left between 2 and 3 pm, leaving no possibility for late changes or dynamic workflow. Likewise, the technicians in the morning were unable to start working if they had questions about the work that was assigned for that day because the project managers weren't there yet. But somehow me sticking to the core hours and my biorhythm (and later to my puke schedule when I got pregnant) made me the lazy and weird one - it was me and Patrick who were ok starting machines after incubation was done at 5 pm, do emergency tests at 4 pm, bring over vials at 6 pm. Patrick didn't judge anyone and was the only one who liked me and supported my pregnancy while my tech colleagues wished me dead and my baby aborted, miscarried, stillborn or disabled. Fuck them.
Patrick quickly became the team lead. I am not at that company anymore but I am glad he managed to rise up that quickly. Patrick, I doubt you're on lemmy but thanks again for covering for me and pipetting the formaldehyde. My daughter is a healthy girl and I am glad you had my back.
4:30 am?
Yes, 4:30 am, but I was the one who was nuts for getting in so late