this post was submitted on 04 Apr 2025
22 points (92.3% liked)

Color

102 readers
47 users here now

Color theory, palettes, fun uses of color, psychology, etc.

Civility is aggressively enforced: do not be rude, troll-y, flame-bait-y, etc. If someone else is, please report, block as necessary, and move on.

Comments that cannot reasonably lead to discussion or which have no analysis ("first!", "lol", [string of emojis]) will be deleted. Please do not post them.

founded 4 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago (2 children)

Did you read the article?

“All colors are made up by the brain. Full stop,” says this visual scientist at Newcastle University in England. They’re our brain’s way of interpreting signals from our eyes. And they add so much meaning to things we perceive, she says.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 23 hours ago* (last edited 23 hours ago) (1 children)

I would still differenciate between: "Does the brain map the Physical World to custom signals, or will it add something to it, because its not possible to see both"

Edit: I meant spectral color and nonspectral color.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

There is still a meaningful distinction between spectral and non-spectral colors as far as I (a non-scientist) is concerned: what one is saying is "this is my perception of a specific wavelength of electromagnetic radiation" and non-spectral colors are "this is my perception of some kind of weird interference between opposing colors or a bizarre trick of the brain or whatever". Color as such is still a purely mental phenomenon but what instigates that phenomenon can be different.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Of course I didn't half my time on lemmy is small bursts while I'm at work

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago (1 children)

If you didn't read the article, then don't leave a top-level comment.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago (2 children)

How is it my fault if it's top level?

[–] [email protected] 1 points 3 hours ago

Because you are responding to the post itself without reading the post. You have nothing to add if you're fundamentally ignorant of what the source is. You may have something meaningful to add in response to another comment, but this is no different than saying "I didn't watch this movie, but here's what I think!' or not doing the reading in a book club and just showing up to throw out random conjecture.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 1 day ago (1 children)

Because you commented on the post directly rather than replying to another comment? Do you think top level means it got upvoted or something?

[–] [email protected] 2 points 1 day ago

ya I'd think "top level" would be more upvoted than most but I think there weren't any other comments at the time