▲ 1167 ▼ Russia Not on US Tariff List Despite Broad Global Reach | Sweden Herald (swedenherald.com) submitted 1 year ago by schizoidman@lemm.ee to c/world@lemmy.world 151 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[+] nutsack@lemmy.dbzer0.com -9 points 1 year ago* (last edited 1 year ago) (3 children) it's funny that this is being downvoted. lemmy is basically reddit. rooting for the good guys, but also dogshit stupid permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] Brumefey@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago Downvoted because it’s wrong : We aren’t tariffing them because we aren’t trading with them. So are some inhabited islands which are hit by tariffs. Maybe the dogshit stupid is the one not seeing the ties between trump and putin. permalink fedilink source parent [–] moriquende@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Damn you sound very smart, please tell me more permalink fedilink source parent [–] kava@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Systems that have voting mechanisms result in hive minds. It's an inevitable result. 1st someone is much more likely to vote something up or down depending on how positive / negative it is. So it snowballs sort of like compounding interest 2nd the simplest most common denominator takes bubble to the top. Precisely because more people can understand and therefore vote. It's why you'll always see some screenshot of Twitter much higher than a long in depth article. Even though the article has infinitely more value. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Brumefey@sh.itjust.works 11 points 1 year ago Downvoted because it’s wrong : We aren’t tariffing them because we aren’t trading with them. So are some inhabited islands which are hit by tariffs. Maybe the dogshit stupid is the one not seeing the ties between trump and putin. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] moriquende@lemmy.world 3 points 1 year ago Damn you sound very smart, please tell me more permalink fedilink source parent
[–] kava@lemmy.world 1 point 1 year ago Systems that have voting mechanisms result in hive minds. It's an inevitable result. 1st someone is much more likely to vote something up or down depending on how positive / negative it is. So it snowballs sort of like compounding interest 2nd the simplest most common denominator takes bubble to the top. Precisely because more people can understand and therefore vote. It's why you'll always see some screenshot of Twitter much higher than a long in depth article. Even though the article has infinitely more value. permalink fedilink source parent