▲ 917 ▼ Mozilla will open Firefox for Android for more extensions (blog.mozilla.org) submitted 3 years ago by sverit@feddit.de to c/technology@beehaw.org 146 comments fedilink hide all child comments
[–] skillissuer@discuss.tchncs.de 40 points 3 years ago (2 children) why it was restricted in the first place? permalink fedilink source hideshow 4 child comments replies: [–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 41 points 3 years ago (1 child) Because there were enough incompatibilities to make it a hassle. But when they were sorting out the Web Manifest v3, they designed it with desktop and mobile in mind, so new extensions won't have problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bankimu@lemm.ee 14 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) It makes less sense since extensions actually ran on Android, e.g. via Nightly and creating your own list of exceptions. Also if you downgrade and install in an old Fennec version, extension will continue to function if you then update to the latest. I think the move was an attempt to create a walled garden. But for whatever reason, they have now decided against it. Thank goodness. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 1 point 3 years ago It would be nice to have stuff here to break this down permalink fedilink source parent [–] ItsTom87@kbin.social 29 points 3 years ago (2 children) Maybe they couldn't guarantee that the mobile version could run well with all of them? That's what I've always assumed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 18 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 13 points 3 years ago (3 children) Which I think is kinda weird decision since they could've just hidden a setting that unlocks all addons in the options. But maybe they were so incompatible at the time that it wasn't worth the headache. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] frogfruit@discuss.online 11 points 3 years ago If you use Beta or Nightly, you can turn on dev tools and use a custom addon list from a collection in your user account. https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2020/09/29/expanded-extension-support-in-firefox-for-android-nightly/ permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheLeechiestLeech@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 years ago There is a hidden way to activate more extensions and most - if not the vast majority - extensions work fine. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Perfide@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago There is a hidden setting for essentially that. It might be exclusive to Nightly though, idk since all I need is UBO permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 41 points 3 years ago (1 child) Because there were enough incompatibilities to make it a hassle. But when they were sorting out the Web Manifest v3, they designed it with desktop and mobile in mind, so new extensions won't have problems. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] bankimu@lemm.ee 14 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) It makes less sense since extensions actually ran on Android, e.g. via Nightly and creating your own list of exceptions. Also if you downgrade and install in an old Fennec version, extension will continue to function if you then update to the latest. I think the move was an attempt to create a walled garden. But for whatever reason, they have now decided against it. Thank goodness. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 1 point 3 years ago It would be nice to have stuff here to break this down permalink fedilink source parent
[–] bankimu@lemm.ee 14 points 3 years ago* (last edited 3 years ago) (1 child) It makes less sense since extensions actually ran on Android, e.g. via Nightly and creating your own list of exceptions. Also if you downgrade and install in an old Fennec version, extension will continue to function if you then update to the latest. I think the move was an attempt to create a walled garden. But for whatever reason, they have now decided against it. Thank goodness. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 2 child comments replies: [–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 1 point 3 years ago It would be nice to have stuff here to break this down permalink fedilink source parent
[–] sabreW4K3@lemmy.tf 1 point 3 years ago It would be nice to have stuff here to break this down permalink fedilink source parent
[–] ItsTom87@kbin.social 29 points 3 years ago (2 children) Maybe they couldn't guarantee that the mobile version could run well with all of them? That's what I've always assumed. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 4 child comments replies: [+] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 18 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent [–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 13 points 3 years ago (3 children) Which I think is kinda weird decision since they could've just hidden a setting that unlocks all addons in the options. But maybe they were so incompatible at the time that it wasn't worth the headache. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] frogfruit@discuss.online 11 points 3 years ago If you use Beta or Nightly, you can turn on dev tools and use a custom addon list from a collection in your user account. https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2020/09/29/expanded-extension-support-in-firefox-for-android-nightly/ permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheLeechiestLeech@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 years ago There is a hidden way to activate more extensions and most - if not the vast majority - extensions work fine. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Perfide@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago There is a hidden setting for essentially that. It might be exclusive to Nightly though, idk since all I need is UBO permalink fedilink source parent
[+] skullgiver@popplesburger.hilciferous.nl 18 points 3 years ago* (last edited 2 years ago) [deleted] permalink fedilink source parent
[–] GunnarRunnar@kbin.social 13 points 3 years ago (3 children) Which I think is kinda weird decision since they could've just hidden a setting that unlocks all addons in the options. But maybe they were so incompatible at the time that it wasn't worth the headache. permalink fedilink source parent hideshow 6 child comments replies: [–] frogfruit@discuss.online 11 points 3 years ago If you use Beta or Nightly, you can turn on dev tools and use a custom addon list from a collection in your user account. https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2020/09/29/expanded-extension-support-in-firefox-for-android-nightly/ permalink fedilink source parent [–] TheLeechiestLeech@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 years ago There is a hidden way to activate more extensions and most - if not the vast majority - extensions work fine. permalink fedilink source parent [–] Perfide@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago There is a hidden setting for essentially that. It might be exclusive to Nightly though, idk since all I need is UBO permalink fedilink source parent
[–] frogfruit@discuss.online 11 points 3 years ago If you use Beta or Nightly, you can turn on dev tools and use a custom addon list from a collection in your user account. https://blog.mozilla.org/addons/2020/09/29/expanded-extension-support-in-firefox-for-android-nightly/ permalink fedilink source parent
[–] TheLeechiestLeech@lemmy.dbzer0.com 7 points 3 years ago There is a hidden way to activate more extensions and most - if not the vast majority - extensions work fine. permalink fedilink source parent
[–] Perfide@reddthat.com 1 point 3 years ago There is a hidden setting for essentially that. It might be exclusive to Nightly though, idk since all I need is UBO permalink fedilink source parent