294
A third of Americans don't drive. So why is our transportation so car-centric?
(yaleclimateconnections.org)
this post was submitted on 29 Mar 2025
294 points (96.8% liked)
Fuck Cars
11073 readers
188 users here now
A place to discuss problems of car centric infrastructure or how it hurts us all. Let's explore the bad world of Cars!
Rules
1. Be Civil
You may not agree on ideas, but please do not be needlessly rude or insulting to other people in this community.
2. No hate speech
Don't discriminate or disparage people on the basis of sex, gender, race, ethnicity, nationality, religion, or sexuality.
3. Don't harass people
Don't follow people you disagree with into multiple threads or into PMs to insult, disparage, or otherwise attack them. And certainly don't doxx any non-public figures.
4. Stay on topic
This community is about cars, their externalities in society, car-dependency, and solutions to these.
5. No reposts
Do not repost content that has already been posted in this community.
Moderator discretion will be used to judge reports with regard to the above rules.
Posting Guidelines
In the absence of a flair system on lemmy yet, let’s try to make it easier to scan through posts by type in here by using tags:
- [meta] for discussions/suggestions about this community itself
- [article] for news articles
- [blog] for any blog-style content
- [video] for video resources
- [academic] for academic studies and sources
- [discussion] for text post questions, rants, and/or discussions
- [meme] for memes
- [image] for any non-meme images
- [misc] for anything that doesn’t fall cleanly into any of the other categories
Recommended communities:
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
20% of Americans are children under the age of 18 and so don't need to drive....
So the other 66% are driving.
That leaves only 14% of people who refuse to. I'd say that's a pretty good reason to have a car-centric nation.
This isn't Europe where everything is within walking distance of you, and it's infeasible to do such a thing here in America.
No, 66% having a drivers license, doesn't mean 66% drive. And even those who usually do, can't drive all the time. There are a lot of reasons why you might be unable to drive, even if you have a license: Being drunk, being sick/injured, being to old to safely drive, being to tired to safely drive, being to broke to afford the gas...
And even of those who do drive, a large percentage might not drive because they want to, but because they are forced to drive due to a lack of walking, cycling and public transportation infrastructure.
It doesn't matter how big your country is. Nobody in their right mind drives from New York to San Francisco on a daily basis, not even from New York to Philadelphia.
The vast majority of commutes are from your home to the local school, the local supermarket or the local workplace within the same town. A distance that could easily be traveled by bike if there was any bike infrastructure even in today's US cities. Granted, the distance you have to travel to get to these places is usually bigger in the US, than in Europe, but that's only because you don't have mixed neighbourhoods. And you don't have mixed neighbourhoods because every little convenience store needs to be surrounded by 200 acres of parking because you can only get there by car.
@brotundspiele @kitnaht
Grammar Correction: Too, to and two are not interchangeable.
Correct usage: He was too old, too drunk and too sick to drive two blocks to the store. Two dollars is too much to pay.
I fully agree with you and #FuckCars
#homophones #Grammar
Normally I know that, but I guess I was just two tired while typing 😂
Your childhood must've been very different from mine! I needed to get places as a kid, like school, friends' houses, stores, parks, the library, and more.
@SwingingTheLamp @kitnaht In a functional community, kids can get to all those places by walking or biking. Sorry your parents raised you in sprawl hell instead of a real neighborhood.
Ah, but that's the issue highlighted in the article: Most of the United States is not a functional community.
Seriously, people get so triggered and come in here saying the most ignorant shit. It's actually worse than the vegan communities for how often it happens.
They still need a way to get around any transport would make that easier
And transport still needs what...think that through a little more...
The roads for mass transit are the same as they are for individual transit...and they aren't specialized, they're universal. A small car, bike, bus, or semi can all drive on the same road.
A train track can only be used by a train. Sidewalks can only be used by pedestrians and maybe bikers.
A road however -- can be used by all shape and size of transport; including the transport that the last 14% need.
Sure, a bike can use the same roads cars are using. Have fun with that.
Btw. a train track can be used by cargo trains, passenger trains, trains carrying cars, trains carrying bikes, etc. If you build decent bike lanes, they can even be used by ambulances to skip traffic.
This doesn't seem like a good-faith argument, because this is a pre-schooler's take on transportation issues. Anybody with a passing familiarity with roads can see the holes in it.
Rails & trails. We have spent the last 50 years building “one more lane” to solve traffic & all it does is incentivize more cars. Roads don’t promote high density travel like a proper bike network in a city or a commuter rail network to connect suburbs together.
That's nonsense. Nearly everyone under 18 needs transportation.
America isn't Europe, but just like in Europe, most American trips are really short