748
DOGE Plans to Rebuild SSA Codebase in Months, Risking Benefits and System Collapse (www.wired.com)
submitted 2 years ago by to c/technology@lemmy.world
192 comments fedilink hide all child comments
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] 34 points 2 years ago (4 children)

Yep, months is a joke, doubly so when talking about tens of millions of lines of code and also COBOL specifically.

This is going to be a hilarious disaster but not so hilarious when people who need the benefits need them and won't be able to get them.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 4 child comments
    •
  • [–] 6 points 2 years ago

    I'm on SSDI (and Medicaid and HUD housing) and have been having insane anxiety the last month and a half to the point that I'm wondering if I'll even get paid in April. I regularly check my SSA account online to make sure my direct deposit is still freaking scheduled. Missing a payment could mess up all of my other benefits as well.

    I know the fuck up is coming, but I don't know if I can handle another few months hoping they don't fuck up the migration if they don't fuck up just paying people first with all that's been going on.

    I'm pretty sure Im not the only one in this situation who can't handle the stress of this bullshit.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago (2 children)

    To be fair. We assume "months" means less than 2 years. But 10 years can also be "months", and is probably a more realistic timeline.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 2 child comments
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago* (1 child)

    Nobody is referring to 10 years as "months".

    When you're talking about multiples of years, it's going to be called years, not months. They were obviously talking about a short timeline, less than 2 years, likely less than 1 year.

    They have no idea what they're talking about.

    Like I said, months is a joke.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent
  • hideshow 1 child comment
    •
  • [–] 2 points 2 years ago

    So was what I said. I was presenting a hypothetical way they justify their ridiculous claims by doing something else ridiculous.

    But conveying tone in text is difficult, so I'm not surprised you missed what I was going for.

  • permalink
  • fedilink
  • source
  • parent