296
On Reddit's r/privacy, you can no longer criticize Facebook
(www.reddit.com)
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 25 Mar 2025
296 points (97.4% liked)
Privacy
2693 readers
745 users here now
Welcome! This is a community for all those who are interested in protecting their privacy.
Rules
PS: Don't be a smartass and try to game the system, we'll know if you're breaking the rules when we see it!
- Be civil and no prejudice
- Don't promote big-tech software
- No apathy and defeatism for privacy (i.e. "They already have my data, why bother?")
- No reposting of news that was already posted
- No crypto, blockchain, NFTs
- No Xitter links (if absolutely necessary, use xcancel)
Related communities:
Some of these are only vaguely related, but great communities.
founded 7 months ago
MODERATORS
The comment that you replied to does not imply the phone number can be used to decrypt messages. All they are saying is that because Signal accounts are tied to phone numbers, a potential adversary already has one piece of the puzzle (who is talking to whom). If somehow, some way, the encryption were ever compromised, then the adversary would have both pieces—in other words, they would know not only who is talking to whom but also what they are saying.
If the encryption is ever hacked, knowing who you are is probably the least of anyone's concerns. I would imagine that any adversary could build a profile or plan a response without knowing a particular phone number.
"These two people are planning civil rights activism here on Friday," is just as useful as, "MLK Jr and Malcolm X are planning activism here on Friday."
Thankfully, they'd have to not only break encryption but also MitM the conversations, since Signal doesn't actually store chat data on their servers.