this post was submitted on 23 Jun 2023
232 points (100.0% liked)

Technology

37603 readers
366 users here now

A nice place to discuss rumors, happenings, innovations, and challenges in the technology sphere. We also welcome discussions on the intersections of technology and society. If it’s technological news or discussion of technology, it probably belongs here.

Remember the overriding ethos on Beehaw: Be(e) Nice. Each user you encounter here is a person, and should be treated with kindness (even if they’re wrong, or use a Linux distro you don’t like). Personal attacks will not be tolerated.

Subcommunities on Beehaw:


This community's icon was made by Aaron Schneider, under the CC-BY-NC-SA 4.0 license.

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

So Jerboa broke on my phone just now and I didn't want to stop browsing Lemmy. Unfortunately no suitable alternative was found so I just decided to check if I could open it in my browser and install it.

To my surprise, it worked. And it works really well quite frankly. Sure, the UI is different, but I'm not at all missing any features.

Did any of you guys try it as well? What's your opinion?

If not, did you even know that was a possibility? It quite frankly never crossed my mind, because Reddit and other platforms always force you to use an app when you open them in a browser.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 22 points 1 year ago (7 children)

Ive been exclusively browsing on mobile web, same as I did reddit. This layout is much more user friendly forsure.

[–] [email protected] 28 points 1 year ago (5 children)

The benefit of not having half the screen devoted to trying to get you to download the app is a huge bonus.

[–] [email protected] 19 points 1 year ago (4 children)

This Apollo-like webapp is new too, and I like it quite a bit: https://wefwef.app

[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 year ago

Woah. This is a game changer. Thank you!

load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (3 replies)
load more comments (4 replies)