you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
this post was submitted on 23 Mar 2025
5 points (100.0% liked)
Rage
118 readers
1 users here now
A Community to talk about Music from the Australian perspective.
Telling stories of Australia through music.
With few exceptions, Australian acts are permitted to have one hit in the US charts, then fall out of the international limelight.
Those acts however often have lots of other cool songs!
There are also several Australian acts that just aren't famous globally.
This Community is not affiliated with the ABC, yet. Please don't sue us, Auntie. We love you!
Music/Industry News and Gig Guides
Collapse Board, Brisbane, Music Journalism
Livewire, Australia and Brisbane Based
The Point Music News, Queensland
Music Feeds, Music and Lifestyle
The Rockpit, Hard Rock, Metal and Blues
Rhythms, Blues, Folk, Jazz, World
Limelight, Music Arts, Culture
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
I propose, for the sake of it, we can have fun with an Instant-Runoff Vote similar to our electoral system. (This is not to endorse IRV as the theoretically ideal method for this election, see here, but it's simple enough, ~~familiar~~ Australian enough, and good enough)
How my proposal would work:
code formatting
so they can copy-paste it into the comment field). Once the voting deadline is up, the IRV process is followed - votes are allocated to each ballot's top remaining preference, the candidate with the least votes is eliminated and their votes re-distributed to those ballots' next preference, repeat until a candidate passes 50%.(Since this competition is a small scale, there are online tools which can semi-automate and validate the IRV count - https://petertheone.github.io/IRV/ seems like a simple one)
Some issues I foresee:
An example of a ballot template:
(use the 'source' button to see how I created this, note the four backticks surrounding everything, because there's already three backticks used for formatting the candidate section)What that ballot looks like when filled in and posted:
LemmyVision 2 Australian Nomination Ballot (1977 edition)
Place a number inside the box next to ALL songs, ranking them from 1 to 4 in order of preference.
I was going to suggest a preferential voting system, too! I support what you've laid out 👍
We might not need to worry too much about it, and if ballots will be submitted as comments, people would at least need alt accounts to do ballot stuffing.
If we do want to set some eligibility standard just in case, though - and it could avoid contention to set a standard up-front - I think it'd be reasonable to set the criteria that users should be 'active on the instance'. An objective standard for that could be something like 'has commented at least 2 times in communities on this instance, prior to this week'.
I think this is a great idea.
Yeah i think thats fair.
The only stipulation i saw from Jlai.lu was to gather 'members' of the 'Community'. So i supposr they're meaning anybody subscribed to c/rage. My concern is c/rage isn't the most subscribed to community on aussie.zone.
I can ask, but i'd imagine if we've got a fair system for capturing lots of aussie.zone users in general that'd be acceptable.
I don't really understand what the backticks are being used for.
Other than that, this set up looks great! Far better than i could've thought of!
I can try to implement this idea, but i think you've got a good vision here i doubt i'll recreate well. If you have the time, could you do the ballot post? I can sticky it when you post it.
Sure thing, I'll post it tommorow night.
Some sites like reddit and Lemmy used 'markdown' style text formating, certain symbols tell Lemmy to format text differently (the Lemmy guide can be found by clicking that (?) button at the end of the formatting buttons in the top of the reply box).
Mardown sometimes tries to format text when you don't want to. If you just want Lemmy to ignore symbols then you can use a backslash to 'escape' the formatting character (e.g. I use \* to type *claps hands* instead of claps hands).
Markdown uses backticks to signal code formatting (intended for any data a computer would input or output). Single backticks are for small snippets of
inline code
and triple backticks are used to markCode formatting adds programming language syntax colouring, makes the letters all the same width ('monospaced') and, most importantly here, ignores markdown formatting which in this case would have normally turned that text all bold and italic.
My ballot template is markdown code for people to copy. I can't just type it out normally, or Lemmy would interpret all the formatting when I post it and you wouldn't have any formatting left to copy and paste! So the backticks tell Lemmy that it's code, don't format it normally.
The quadruple backticks are an advanced trick, I had to look up how to do it. My ballot template (markdown code) also has a code block nested inside it! The nested one is because I wanted the actual list of songs in a code block to make the boxes line up to look neater and be easier to read: [1], [2], [3] could be all different widths in some fonts but
[1]
,[2]
,[3]
are all the same. The quad backticks is kind of similar to double quoting, triple quoting, etc., adding more of a symbol to nest the formatting:Wow! Thats attention to detail with the nested code blocks. Didn't even notice this.
I'll have to save this comment and try it a few times. I've been slowly experimenting with Markdown, the guides are usually good, but it is time consuming, and i didn't think it was appropriate for me to pissfart about this week experimenting, while people have votes to be casting! :)
Cheers @[email protected]
So, if we're going Australian style does that mean those users who don't vote have to buy Lodion a coffee on Kofi as a fine? /j