this post was submitted on 14 Mar 2025
1102 points (99.3% liked)

Technology

66465 readers
4572 users here now

This is a most excellent place for technology news and articles.


Our Rules


  1. Follow the lemmy.world rules.
  2. Only tech related content.
  3. Be excellent to each other!
  4. Mod approved content bots can post up to 10 articles per day.
  5. Threads asking for personal tech support may be deleted.
  6. Politics threads may be removed.
  7. No memes allowed as posts, OK to post as comments.
  8. Only approved bots from the list below, this includes using AI responses and summaries. To ask if your bot can be added please contact a mod.
  9. Check for duplicates before posting, duplicates may be removed
  10. Accounts 7 days and younger will have their posts automatically removed.

Approved Bots


founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 38 points 13 hours ago (3 children)

This has always blown my mind. Watching people willingly allow Big Brother-esque devices into their home for very, very minor conveniences like turning on some gimmicky multi-colored light bulbs. Now they're literally using home "security" cameras that store everything on some random cloud server. I'll truly never understand.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 hours ago (1 children)

My mom has one of those Google ones, I hate it.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 29 minutes ago

My brother and a buddy both have Alexas. And yeah, I hate being anywhere near the thing.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (3 children)

Why has no security researcher published evidence of these devices with microphones uploading random conversations? Nobody working on the inside has ever leaked anything regarding this potentially massive breach of privacy? A perfectly secret conspiracy by everyone involved?

We know more about top secret NSA programs than we do about this proposed Alexa spy mechanism. None of the people working on this at Amazon have wanted to leak anything?

I’m not saying it’s not possible, but it seems extremely improbable to me that everyone’s microphones are listening to their conversations, they’re being uploaded somewhere to serve them better ads, and absolutely nobody has leaked anything or found any evidence.

[–] [email protected] 13 points 12 hours ago (3 children)

Nobody working on the inside has ever leaked anything regarding this potentially massive breach of privacy? A perfectly secret conspiracy by everyone involved?

I hate to be the bearer of bad news, but...

[–] [email protected] 4 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago)

Sure, but that’s not the commonly repeated conspiracy, even by non technical normal people, that everyone’s mics are listening all the time and they’re being used to serve you ads or whatever. The scale of this is not at all comparable to what I’m talking about. Yeah, I’m sure sometimes devices are inactivated inadvertently, those responses are uploaded, and people have listened to those recordings when they didn’t have permission. That is a far cry from all devices listening nearly all the time, using some surreptitious method to upload the data, and what was being recorded being used for some nefarious purpose.

Again, I’m not excusing these devices for being a privacy nightmare, but I just think it’s extremely implausible that Alexa, Siri, Google, etc. are always listening and nobody has discovered a device uploading.

The real privacy nightmare is that recording your conversations is completely unnecessary to build a richly detailed profile of you and your contacts. Regular old device / browser fingerprinting and a few people in your group sharing contacts with apps is enough for that, and it’s not a top secret conspiracy.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 11 hours ago (1 children)

Per that article, it only happens when it thinks it's been activated, and only when you opt in. Not much of a bombshell.

[–] [email protected] 8 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

Emphasis on "when it thinks". Not much point to a privacy control that the device can just ignore for unspecified reasons, and they had 150+ instances of that occurring in this data set.

[–] [email protected] -2 points 10 hours ago (1 children)

~150 inadvertent activations is pretty low for the number of devices times however many years it spans.

[–] [email protected] 6 points 9 hours ago

From the linked article

But VRT NWS said that 153 of the 1,000 recordings it listened to "were conversations that should never have been recorded and during which the command 'OK Google' was clearly not given."

15% of the recordings these reporters listened to were "inadvertant." I'd say that's pretty high.

[–] [email protected] 5 points 12 hours ago* (last edited 12 hours ago) (2 children)

Argument from ignorance

It's better to be safe than sorry is all I'm saying.

Edit: There's also this.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 10 hours ago* (last edited 10 hours ago) (1 children)

I’m not saying it’s not possible

There is no argument from ignorance fallacy in what I said. I am not claiming these devices never send audio without you wanting because there’s no evidence to the contrary.

However, the idea that everyone’s microphones are always listening, and that’s why you saw an ad for whatever after talking to your friend, yet not a single person has observed a device uploading this kind of data, nor has anyone ever leaked any kind of information on this supposed system, is extremely unlikely to be true in my opinion.

They don’t need microphones to do this. Regular tracking is plenty to do a good job at suggesting you a highly relevant ad, and frequency illusion does the rest. You’re not noticing the thousand times you see ads that are irrelevant to whatever you were talking about, but the one time you do notice really sticks out.

Frankly there are plenty of more concerning ways of violating our privacy that are out in the open that I believe are a much higher priority than mics always recording, of which there is no evidence for.

[–] [email protected] 1 points 9 hours ago* (last edited 9 hours ago)

If no proof is offered (in either direction), then the proposition can be called unproven, undecided, inconclusive, an open problem or a conjecture.

Stating that you don't think that it's possible is irrelevant. It's either happening or it isn't. True or false. P or ¬P.

is extremely unlikely to be true in my opinion.

Is an argument from ignorance. Not trying to be rude, but this is basic logic.

[–] [email protected] -1 points 12 hours ago (1 children)
[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago

Yeah, but it's rooted and running a custom ROM ;)

[–] [email protected] 4 points 11 hours ago

Because if they would publish it, the other security experts would say "well, duh, that's how it works".

It is just the average people that are unaware of it, or don't seem to care.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago (2 children)

I mean... I 100% agree, and yet you and I and everyone reading this are carrying around a phone that can do the exact same shit

[–] [email protected] 3 points 8 hours ago* (last edited 8 hours ago)

I am not, thank you very much. Even if I wasn't, you can simply disable the wake word. And you can go into your account and see/listen to any recordings it has made to verify that it has stopped listening.

[–] [email protected] 4 points 12 hours ago

This is why jailbreaking/rooting your phone is so important.