view the rest of the comments
the_dunk_tank
It's the dunk tank.
This is where you come to post big-brained hot takes by chuds, libs, or even fellow leftists, and tear them to itty-bitty pieces with precision dunkstrikes.
Rule 1: All posts must include links to the subject matter, and no identifying information should be redacted.
Rule 2: If your source is a reactionary website, please use archive.is instead of linking directly.
Rule 3: No sectarianism.
Rule 4: TERF/SWERFs Not Welcome
Rule 5: No ableism of any kind (that includes stuff like libt*rd)
Rule 6: Do not post fellow hexbears.
Rule 7: Do not individually target other instances' admins or moderators.
Rule 8: The subject of a post cannot be low hanging fruit, that is comments/posts made by a private person that have low amount of upvotes/likes/views. Comments/Posts made on other instances that are accessible from hexbear are an exception to this. Posts that do not meet this requirement can be posted to [email protected]
Rule 9: if you post ironic rage bait im going to make a personal visit to your house to make sure you never make this mistake again
'and allies' doing some heavy lifting considering the thread doesn't mention the US producing anything. According to this, 86% of China's imports are from Canada, Australia, and the UK. Maybe the US does produce some, but doesn't have significant contracts with China.
Either way, it'll be a challenge to convince CAUK to stop selling to China during their recessions because the US can't do much with the raw materials and it's traders aren't going to be overly interested in buying up the nickel for a rainy day. US bonds might be a fix but who wants to sell valuable resources for tickets to a sinking ship? Maybe they won't know the US can't avoid the iceberg at this point?
Regardless of any of this, Cha doesn't seem to realise that China will likely be able to survive a lot better without nickel than the west can survive without… more or less everything. I don't think these 'intellectuals' have fully come to terms with what neoliberalism means yet.
The parts of the working class that gets or would get it's hands dirty knows; they've seen their mining towns, ports, farms, and factories deteriorate or disappear. But the commentariat doesn't seem to be aware that anything like a blitz spirit or post-war boom isn't possible if you don't have the industries to make anything or a political economy that could conceive of increasing domestic industrial capital.
"We will stop selling to our enemies" and "we will instruct our colonial subjects to stop selling to our enemies" sure hits different.
Im 1000% sure that the recent US strategy is to impoverish and make americans stupider as to do scarier jobs and go back to working in factories. They already know that the dependence on Chinese economy has to end