this post was submitted on 08 Mar 2025
74 points (96.2% liked)

politics

21143 readers
3422 users here now

Welcome to the discussion of US Politics!

Rules:

  1. Post only links to articles, Title must fairly describe link contents. If your title differs from the site’s, it should only be to add context or be more descriptive. Do not post entire articles in the body or in the comments.

Links must be to the original source, not an aggregator like Google Amp, MSN, or Yahoo.

Example:

  1. Articles must be relevant to politics. Links must be to quality and original content. Articles should be worth reading. Clickbait, stub articles, and rehosted or stolen content are not allowed. Check your source for Reliability and Bias here.
  2. Be civil, No violations of TOS. It’s OK to say the subject of an article is behaving like a (pejorative, pejorative). It’s NOT OK to say another USER is (pejorative). Strong language is fine, just not directed at other members. Engage in good-faith and with respect! This includes accusing another user of being a bot or paid actor. Trolling is uncivil and is grounds for removal and/or a community ban.
  3. No memes, trolling, or low-effort comments. Reposts, misinformation, off-topic, trolling, or offensive. Similarly, if you see posts along these lines, do not engage. Report them, block them, and live a happier life than they do. We see too many slapfights that boil down to "Mom! He's bugging me!" and "I'm not touching you!" Going forward, slapfights will result in removed comments and temp bans to cool off.
  4. Vote based on comment quality, not agreement. This community aims to foster discussion; please reward people for putting effort into articulating their viewpoint, even if you disagree with it.
  5. No hate speech, slurs, celebrating death, advocating violence, or abusive language. This will result in a ban. Usernames containing racist, or inappropriate slurs will be banned without warning

We ask that the users report any comment or post that violate the rules, to use critical thinking when reading, posting or commenting. Users that post off-topic spam, advocate violence, have multiple comments or posts removed, weaponize reports or violate the code of conduct will be banned.

All posts and comments will be reviewed on a case-by-case basis. This means that some content that violates the rules may be allowed, while other content that does not violate the rules may be removed. The moderators retain the right to remove any content and ban users.

That's all the rules!

Civic Links

Register To Vote

Citizenship Resource Center

Congressional Awards Program

Federal Government Agencies

Library of Congress Legislative Resources

The White House

U.S. House of Representatives

U.S. Senate

Partnered Communities:

News

World News

Business News

Political Discussion

Ask Politics

Military News

Global Politics

Moderate Politics

Progressive Politics

UK Politics

Canadian Politics

Australian Politics

New Zealand Politics

founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
 

This primarily follows the tale of Bob Levinson, former FBI mob hunter that likely died in Iran in 2020 after being kidnapped. Possibly having been lured into a trap

Alexander L. died telling us that the Russian government was taken over by the Russian mafia. What would Bob Levinson have told us?

Russian influence has infiltrated us at every level

The Russians already got the UK to leave the EU - a goal since "The Foundations of Geopolitics"

This mostly follows context up to the 2020 election

Here is one quote from the article, page 3. Below the quote, within the article is the video they are referencing.

"With a bank behind him, all that was left to do for Semion was take out the “hunters.” He began locally – in Russia. Semion launched his attack on Russian intelligence and law enforcement, using his leverage over politicians to compromise any and all checks and balances against his own mob.

Here is a link to a supporting article, which provides an analysis on how Putin was used to help execute Semion’s strategy for turning Russia into a Mafiya State. It provides a brief historical narrative on the early moves of Semion’s mob after the fall of the Soviet Empire, and provides further resource links for you to read and explore: 

(http://www.citjourno.org/putdoc)

So that you understand, here, what we are revealing to you about Putin and Semion, we have obtained video of Semion Mogilevich at Vladmir Putin’s campaign headquarters in 2000 – watching his man ascend to the Presidency. This is five years after a global intelligence report on Semion’s mafia empire.

You will see Don Semyon looking back to the camera at 1:15."

They are saying Putin is essentially the government face of Semion's Russian mob. Putin is publicly known as the head of the Russian mob and this just provides further context.

To be clear, they use many mainstream sources you will consider trusted.

From Wikipedia:

"William S Session, Director of the FBI from 1987 to 1993 during the presidencies of Ronald Reagan and George H W Bush, was Mogilevich's attorney in the United States until Sessions' death on June 12, 2020."

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 1 points 1 day ago (3 children)

No javascript over insecure connection! Archived versions all seem broken (or empty). Yeah, no, sorry.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 1 day ago* (last edited 1 day ago) (2 children)

Not sure what you mean. If there's no JavaScript, there's no malicious scripts then... would need to be JavaScript or some other script for it to be malicious.. otherwise it's just a static website... don't throw out buzz words

It's not my website so I can't add https. Run it in a sandbox if you're so concerned.

[–] [email protected] 2 points 12 hours ago (1 children)

If there’s no JavaScript, there’s no malicious scripts

But there is, tons of it! And I can't see anything. The content is obscured without it. It's not static html.

[–] [email protected] 0 points 4 hours ago* (last edited 2 hours ago)

You're giving me mixed messages is all. I believe you. You just said the opposite in your first reply. Or, it seems I misunderstood what you meant.

You weren't saying "the site has no JavaScript," you were saying "I'm not allowing JS over an insecure connection." Got it.

Just miscommunication my friend. I am not pushing back against your claims. It is not my site to defend.