this post was submitted on 06 Mar 2025
424 points (99.1% liked)

Open Source

33927 readers
215 users here now

All about open source! Feel free to ask questions, and share news, and interesting stuff!

Useful Links

Rules

Related Communities

Community icon from opensource.org, but we are not affiliated with them.

founded 5 years ago
MODERATORS
 

Thought this was interesting and worth knowing about

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
[–] [email protected] 4 points 2 days ago (3 children)

legally,"sell" includes things that most people wouldn't consider a sale in normal parlance

Like what, any specific examples?

I have been hearing this repeatedly as a talking point from people defending Firefox but without any specific example of what they do and don’t allow themselves to take and sell, it rings quite hollow.

[–] [email protected] 10 points 2 days ago (1 children)

https://blog.mozilla.org/en/products/firefox/update-on-terms-of-use/

The reason we’ve stepped away from making blanket claims that “We never sell your data” is because, in some places, the LEGAL definition of “sale of data” is broad and evolving. As an example, the California Consumer Privacy Act (CCPA) defines “sale” as the “selling, renting, releasing, disclosing, disseminating, making available, transferring, or otherwise communicating orally, in writing, or by electronic or other means, a consumer’s personal information by [a] business to another business or a third party” in exchange for “monetary” or “other valuable consideration.”

If they give anybody any information for any reason, they open themselves to litigation - however frivolous and unwarranted - because the laws are written to be intentionally vague, to capture a wide variety of scenarios, including those that the law does not explicitly state. There are tons of valuable exchanges that could occur other than strictly data for money, and those exchanges are therefore captured within this new legal definition. To protect themselves from frivolous lawsuits and to remain consistent within the new definitions of these laws, Firefox/Mozilla has changed their Terms of Use. Their uses of data are outlined within their Privacy Policy (linked within the above post).

I suppose this information is only valuable if one trusts Mozilla - one of the most stalwart, dedicated, and outspoken advocates for consumer rights in the digital age.

I'm not saying Mozilla is infallible or above reproach - nobody/nothing is or should be considered so - but if I'm gonna trust any group that says "I'm not fucking you over" it's gonna be the group that has a consistent and very clear history of championing the idea of not fucking people over

[–] [email protected] 3 points 2 days ago

Doesn't the new wording also include monetary exchange as well. Wouldn't that mean they could sell your data at anytime even if they are currently not?

[–] [email protected] 5 points 2 days ago* (last edited 2 days ago)

To be clear, I'm not particularly interested in defending Mozilla. This confusing mess is at least partly their fault, and I think users are right to hold them accountable. I just want people to be able to make informed decisions and not ones based on the internet blowing things up needlessly.

Rather than repeat myself, here's my comment to someone who asked basically the same thing.

https://reddthat.com/comment/17046485

[–] [email protected] 2 points 2 days ago

They could tell us precisely what they're selling, and to whom, and give us a button to say "hell no", and it'd be largely fine. Instead, it's a bunch of "oh, you wouldn't understand"