Excellent Reads

1738 readers

134 users here now

Are you tired of clickbait and the current state of journalism? This community is meant to remind you that excellent journalism still happens. While not sticking to a specific topic, the focus will be on high-quality articles and discussion around their topics.

Politics is allowed, but should not be the main focus of the community.

Submissions should be articles of medium length or longer. As in, it should take you 5 minutes or more to read it. Article series’ would also qualify.

Rules:

Common Sense. Civility, etc.
Server rules.
Please either submit an archive link, or include it in your summary.

Other comms that might be of interest:

founded 2 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

In an Age of Right-Wing Populism, Why Are Denmark’s Liberals Winning? (www.nytimes.com)

submitted 22 hours ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

33 comments fedilink hide all child comments

Around the world, progressive parties have come to see tight immigration restrictions as unnecessary, even cruel. What if they’re actually the only way for progressivism to flourish?

That the era of low immigration was also the era of progressive triumph is no coincidence. [...] The United States felt more like a cohesive nation to many voters, with higher levels of social trust and national pride, and politicians were able to enact higher taxes on the rich and new benefits like Social Security, Medicare and Medicaid.

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 9 points 9 hours ago

No, it is not literally national-socialism. That one shared nothing but the name with any left wing parties and policies.

Nazis were always hard right wing and the greatest success the neo-Nazis ever had was convince people that Nazis were somehow left-wing.