this post was submitted on 19 Feb 2025
68 points (100.0% liked)
TechTakes
1640 readers
50 users here now
Big brain tech dude got yet another clueless take over at HackerNews etc? Here's the place to vent. Orange site, VC foolishness, all welcome.
This is not debate club. Unless it’s amusing debate.
For actually-good tech, you want our NotAwfulTech community
founded 2 years ago
MODERATORS
you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments
view the rest of the comments
HP finding new lows to get to with printers is honestly kind of impressive. depressing as fuck, but impressive. maybe this is how the sentient printers from Gawne's Old Guy verse start up
also, I was sent this earlier:
transcript
@Chrisman tweet text reads: "You start a company and think what's the worst that could happen, we go bankrupt and the company dies? No. It can get so, so much worse than that." with an image screenshot from an article (not linked)screenshot reads: "Bloomberg reports that "Humane's team, including founders Imran Chaudhri and Bethany Bongiorno, will form a new division at HP to help integrate artificial intelligence into the company's personal computers, printers and connected conference rooms,"
@JeremyGurewitz responds: "Obligations to your employees runs deep."
@Chrisman replies: "you have an obligation to your employees not to let them end up integrating ai into printers
Fun question to think about: when was the last time HP made a product that you would actually recommend to anyone?
1970s probably?
the Laserjet 4M from the 1990s, the incredible unstoppable tank of lasers
tank of lasers, you say?
this is a remarkably interesting thing with a surprisingly narrow scope. I don't know mil hardware/history well enough so I'm curious: would such opto-electric ewar actually have been a meaningful capability?
it was ridiculously expensive and almost useless. it's a tank sized dazzler, and it's also very visible to everyone when in use
today we have more powerful lasers that are also more compact, lighter and more efficient. i heard there's some use in ground based missile defense, and that even some combat shootdowns happened, but it's still highly experimental and needs power source. fine on CVN, less so on land
here you have perun video on this topic https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=JGzL3fZgPZY
i think there's also a kind of anti-IR guided anti-aircraft missile thing that consists of IR laser that is supposed to burn its sensors, and it might be mounted on some western jets. it's also much closer range and not sure if it's a thing. it's also much easier than burning missile part that is not a sensor, like in GBAD scenario
highest tech battlefield gopnik discomobile