World News

33507 readers

259 users here now

News from around the world!

Rules:

Please only post links to actual news sources, no tabloid sites, etc
No NSFW content
No hate speech, bigotry, propaganda, etc

founded 5 years ago

MODERATORS

[email protected]

Chinese t-shirt producer wins lawsuit in the UK against fabricators of the Xinjiang forced labor lie. (becivil.co.uk)

submitted 1 week ago by [email protected] to c/[email protected]

10 comments fedilink hide all child comments

you are viewing a single comment's thread
view the rest of the comments

[–] [email protected] 5 points 6 days ago (8 children)

Did the court conclude the accusations were false, or did they only say it was detamatory? I read the full article and the legalese hurts my head. So many words which mean nothing.

[–] [email protected] 3 points 6 days ago* (last edited 6 days ago)

I've found the entire text of the judgement here: https://www.bailii.org/ew/cases/EWHC/KB/2024/3276.html

It's also full of legalese, but as far as I understand the court did not rule on the verity of the statements, only on whether they are defamatory:

Meanings will be considered defamatory at common law if they "substantially affect in an adverse manner the attitude of other people towards a Claimant, or have a tendency to do so"

...

Conclusion:

...

The meanings of both publications are of fact and both are defamatory at common law with a Chase level 2 meaning.

This just means that a lawsuit can move on to factual arguments (i.e. arguments about the truth of those statements). Whoever is more convincing to the judge will win. So IIUC at least, the headline of this post is incorrect.

load more comments (7 replies)